Impact of various postharvest wash water conditions on the performance of peracetic acid against Escherichia coli O157:H7 over time. (March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of various postharvest wash water conditions on the performance of peracetic acid against Escherichia coli O157:H7 over time. (March 2020)
- Main Title:
- Impact of various postharvest wash water conditions on the performance of peracetic acid against Escherichia coli O157:H7 over time
- Authors:
- Ghostlaw, Tiah
Corradini, Maria G.
Autio, Wesley R.
Kinchla, Amanda J. - Abstract:
- Abstract: The Produce Safety Rule, part of the Food Safety Modernization Act, mandates zero detectable generic Escherichia coli for certain agriculture wash water applications: hand-washing, food-contact surface washing, or any water which directly contacts produce, including ice. This requirement emphasizes the need to assess and propose mitigation strategies to control E. coli levels in agriculture wash water. As such, this study investigated the relationship between common sanitizers hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) and peracetic acid (PAA) at varying ratios and the influence of concentration, organic load, temperature, and pH on these sanitizers' stability and efficacy against Escherichia coli O157:H7, including re-inoculation to simulate the reintroduction of pathogens during processing. Generally, sanitizers with PAA as the dominant component were more efficient at reducing E. coli O157:H7 levels over time, compared to those with H2 O2 as the dominant component. Of all of the treatments tested, 50/50 H2 O2 /PAA at 80 ppm in the wash water was the most stable over time and had the highest efficacy against E. coli O157:H7 with organic load capacity below 750 mg/l chemical oxygen demand (COD). Organic loads at 750COD were not able to eliminate E. coli after 3.5 h of treatment, compared to all parameters tested. Based on the results of this study, sanitizer composition, concentration, presence of organic load, temperature and pH have the potential to significantly decrease theAbstract: The Produce Safety Rule, part of the Food Safety Modernization Act, mandates zero detectable generic Escherichia coli for certain agriculture wash water applications: hand-washing, food-contact surface washing, or any water which directly contacts produce, including ice. This requirement emphasizes the need to assess and propose mitigation strategies to control E. coli levels in agriculture wash water. As such, this study investigated the relationship between common sanitizers hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) and peracetic acid (PAA) at varying ratios and the influence of concentration, organic load, temperature, and pH on these sanitizers' stability and efficacy against Escherichia coli O157:H7, including re-inoculation to simulate the reintroduction of pathogens during processing. Generally, sanitizers with PAA as the dominant component were more efficient at reducing E. coli O157:H7 levels over time, compared to those with H2 O2 as the dominant component. Of all of the treatments tested, 50/50 H2 O2 /PAA at 80 ppm in the wash water was the most stable over time and had the highest efficacy against E. coli O157:H7 with organic load capacity below 750 mg/l chemical oxygen demand (COD). Organic loads at 750COD were not able to eliminate E. coli after 3.5 h of treatment, compared to all parameters tested. Based on the results of this study, sanitizer composition, concentration, presence of organic load, temperature and pH have the potential to significantly decrease the efficacy and stability of PAA systems over time, indicating that these parameters should be monitored in agriculture wash water utilization to ensure that water quality and safety are maintained. Highlights: Changes in processing water can influence peracetic acid concentration over time. PAA composition over 50%, increased antimicrobial capacity against E. coli O157:H7. PAA concentrations higher than 30 ppm increased antimicrobial capacity over time. 750COD interferes with sanitizer oxidizing capacity and antimicrobial performance. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Food control. Volume 109(2020)
- Journal:
- Food control
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0109-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03
- Subjects:
- Agricultural water -- Produce sanitizers -- Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and peracetic acid (PAA) -- Produce safety
Food -- Quality -- Periodicals
Food -- Analysis -- Periodicals
Food handling -- Periodicals
Food industry and trade -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Aliments -- Industrie et commerce -- Qualité -- Contrôle -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Qualité -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Analyse -- Périodiques
Hygiène alimentaire -- Périodiques
Food -- Analysis
Food handling
Food -- Quality
Periodicals
Electronic journals
664.07 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09567135 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106891 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0956-7135
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3977.291500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16597.xml