Jump Height and Hip Power Decrease During Cognitive Loading Regardless of Sex: Implications for Sport Performance Metrics. Issue 4 (22nd April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shumski, Eric J.; Lempke, Landon B.; Johnson, Rachel S.; Oh, Jeonghoon; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Lynall, Robert C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of strength and conditioning research. Volume 37:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: 793
• Page End: 798
• Publication Date: 2023-04-22
• Subjects: jump performance -- jump metrics -- dual task -- single task -- drop jump -- sport; Physical education and training -- Periodicals; Weight training -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Physical fitness -- Periodicals; 613.7
• DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004322
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1064-8011

Abstract

Abstract: Shumski, EJ, Lempke, LB, Johnson, RS, Oh, J, Schmidt, JD, and Lynall, RC. Jump height and hip power decrease during cognitive loading regardless of sex: implications for sport performance metrics. J Strength Cond Res 37(4): 793–798, 2023—Sex and cognitive loading separately influence jumping performance. However, it is unknown how cognitive loading influences jump performance and how sex and cognitive loading interact. The purpose of our study was to determine if an interaction existed between sex and cognitive loading for the dependent variables jump height, ground contact time, reactive strength index, vertical stiffness, impulse, and lower extremity joint power during a double limb drop vertical jump. Twenty-one male (23.2 ± 2.5 years, 180.8 ± 8.4 cm, 80.4 ± 10.2 kg) and 20 female (21.7 ± 1.0 years, 163.7 ± 8.2 cm, 61.2 ± 9.4 kg) physically active individuals participated. Subjects jumped from a 30 cm box placed 50% of their height away from 2 force plates under single-task and dual-task (serial 6s or 7s) conditions. Separate 2 × 2 analyses of variance were used for all dependent variables (α = 0.05) with Bonferroni post hoc mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). There were no significant interactions for any outcomes ( p ≥ 0.190). Condition main effects demonstrated subjects jumped significantly higher (1.84 cm, 95% CI = 0.68–3.01, d = 0.26, p = 0.003) and with greater hip power (0.29 Watts·BW −1 ·HT −1, 95% CI = 0.04–0.54, d = 0.21, p = 0.025) during single task compared with dual task. Sex main effects revealed males jumped higher (9.88 cm, 95% CI = 7.00–12.77, d = 2.17, p < 0.001), with greater reactive strength index (0.29, 95% CI = 0.17–0.41, d = 1.52, p < 0.001), greater ankle power (3.70 Watts·BW −1 ·HT −1, 95% CI = 2.26–5.13, d = 1.64, p < 0.001), and greater knee power (5.00 Watts·BW −1 ·HT −1, 95% CI = 3.25–6.75, d = 1.82, p < 0.001) compared with females. Jump performance is influenced by sex and dual-task conditions but not their interaction. To optimize jumping performance, testing should be completed without distractions (single task) to decrease cognitive loading.