Concurrent and prospective associations between fitbit wearable‐derived RDoC arousal and regulatory constructs and adolescent internalizing symptoms. (29th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nelson, Benjamin W.; Flannery, Jessica E.; Flournoy, John; Duell, Natasha; Prinstein, Mitchell J.; Telzer, Eva
• Is Part Of: Journal of child psychology and psychiatry and allied disciplines. Volume 63:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 282
• Page End: 295
• Publication Date: 2021-06-29
• Subjects: Adolescence -- fitbit -- heart rate -- internalizing symptoms -- sleep -- steps -- wearables; Child psychology -- Periodicals; Child psychiatry -- Periodicals; 155.4
• DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13471
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9630

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Adolescence is characterized by alterations in biobehavioral functioning, during which individuals are at heightened risk for onset of psychopathology, particularly internalizing disorders. Researchers have proposed using digital technologies to index daily biobehavioral functioning, yet there is a dearth of research examining how wearable metrics are associated with mental health. Methods: We preregistered analyses using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study dataset using wearable data collection in 5, 686 adolescents (123, 862 person‐days or 2, 972, 688 person‐hours) to determine whether wearable indices of resting heart rate (RHR), step count, and sleep duration and variability in these measures were cross‐sectionally associated with internalizing symptomatology. All models were also run controlling for age, sex, body mass index, socioeconomic status, and race. We then performed prospective analyses on a subset of this sample ( n = 143) across 25 months that had Fitbit data available at baseline and follow‐up in order to explore directionality of effects. Results: Cross‐sectional analyses revealed a small, yet significant, effect size ( R 2 = .053) that higher RHR, lower step count and step count variability, and greater variability in sleep duration were associated with greater internalizing symptoms. Cross‐lagged panel model analysis revealed that there were no prospective associations between wearable variables and internalizing symptoms (partial R 2 = .026), but greater internalizing symptoms and higher RHR predicted lower step count 25 months later (partial R 2 = .010), while higher RHR also predicted lower step count variability 25 months later (partial R 2 = .008). Conclusions: Findings indicate that wearable indices concurrently associate with internalizing symptoms during early adolescence, while a larger sample size is likely required to accurately assess prospective or directional effects between wearable indices and mental health. Future research should capitalize on the temporal resolution provided by wearable devices to determine the intensive longitudinal relations between biobehavioral risk factors and acute changes in mental health.