Position-Specific Physical Workload Intensities in American Collegiate Football Training. Issue 2 (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mamon, Mark A.; Olthof, Sigrid B.H.; Burns, Geoffrey T.; Lepley, Adam S.; Kozloff, Kenneth M.; Zernicke, Ronald F.
• Is Part Of: Journal of strength and conditioning research. Volume 36:Issue 2(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: intercollegiate -- microtechnology -- external load -- team sports -- GPS -- biomechanical load -- accelerations; Physical education and training -- Periodicals; Weight training -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Physical fitness -- Periodicals; 613.7
• DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004174
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1064-8011

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: MamonJr, MA, Olthof, SBH, Burns, GT, Lepley, AS, Kozloff, KM, and Zernicke, RF. Position-specific physical workload intensities in American collegiate football training. J Strength Cond Res 36(2): 420–426, 2022—Quantifying player training loads allows football coaching staff to make informed adjustments to the volume and intensity of training. Physical workload intensity in American football practices have not been extensively quantified. The current study examined physical workload intensities across positions in American collegiate football during training. Data from player tracking technology (Catapult Vector) were collected from 72 American football players (National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I) during in-season practices. Players were involved in individualized skill (indy), team playbook (team), and special team (ST) drills during practice and analyzed for their specialist offensive or defensive role (e.g., linebacker or wide receiver). Player running (i.e., high-speed running and sprint) and accelerations (i.e., high-intensity PlayerLoad and high-intensity inertial movement analysis) per minute were of interest. Drill type and practice day had significant effects on all workload intensity metrics ( p < 0.01), but not position. Greater running intensities were seen in ST drills compared with other drill types. Tuesday practice sessions had greater overall intensities compared with other days. Interaction effect of position and drill type was significant ( p < 0.001) for all intensity metrics, indicating that position groups exhibited unique workload responses to the drill types. Drill type and practice day interaction effect was significant for all intensity metrics ( p < 0.01). The findings may be informative for coaches to tailor physical workloads of practice drills for positional roles in preparation for games and practices. Player tracking technology can add value for strength and conditioning coaches to adjust training programs based on position-specific on-field demands of players. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.