The Value of Thoracic Computed Tomography Scans in Clinical Diagnosis: A Prospective Study. Issue 6 (2006)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Turner, Mark O; Mayo, John R; Müller, Nestor L; Schulzer, Michael; FitzGerald, J Mark
• Is Part Of: Canadian respiratory journal. Volume 13:Issue 6(2006)
• Page Start: 311
• Page End: 316
• Publication Date: 2006
• Subjects: Chest imaging -- Computed tomography -- Diagnostic test -- Health care utilization -- Thoracic; Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiration -- Canada -- Periodicals; Respiration; Respiratory organs -- Diseases; Canada; Respiratory Tract Diseases -- Periodicals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.2
• DOI: 10.1155/2006/859870
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1198-2241

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) scans are used extensively to investigate chest disease because of their cross-sectional perspective and superior contrast resolution compared with chest radiographs. These advantages lead to a more accurate imaging assessment of thoracic disease. The actual use and evaluation of the clinical impact of thoracic CT has not been assessed since scanners became widely available. OBJECTIVE: To identify patterns of utilization, waiting times and the impact of CT scan results on clinical diagnoses. DESIGN: A before and after survey of physicians who had ordered thoracic CT scans. SETTING: Vancouver General Hospital – a tertiary care teaching centre in Vancouver, British Columbia. SUBJECTS: Physicians who had ordered CT scans. INTERVENTION: Physicians completed a standard questionnaire before and after the CT scan result was available. MEASUREMENTS: Changes in the clinical diagnosis, estimates of the probabilities for the diagnosis both before and after the CT scan, and waiting times. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-four thoracic CT cases had completed questionnaires, of whom 80% were outpatients. A change in diagnosis was made in 48% of cases (25% with a normal CT scan and 23% with CT scan findings that indicated a different diagnosis). The largest change in probability scores for the clinical diagnosis before and after the CT scan was 43.9% for normal scans, while it was 36.3% for a different diagnosis and 26.3% for the same diagnosis. High-priority scans were associated with decreased waiting time (−7.89 days for each unit increase in priority). CONCLUSIONS: The CT scan results were associated with a change in diagnosis in 48% of cases. Normal scans constituted 25% of the total and had the greatest impact scores. Waiting times were highly correlated with increased urgency of the presenting problem.