Food4Me study: Validity and reliability of Food Choice Questionnaire in 9 European countries. (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Markovina, Jerko; Stewart-Knox, Barbara J.; Rankin, Audrey; Gibney, Mike; de Almeida, Maria Daniel V.; Fischer, Arnout; Kuznesof, Sharron A.; Poínhos, Rui; Panzone, Luca; Frewer, Lynn J.
• Is Part Of: Food quality and preference. Volume 45(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 26
• Page End: 32
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) -- Survey -- Reliability -- Validity -- Food4Me; Food preferences -- Periodicals; Food -- Quality -- Periodicals; Food industry and trade -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Préférences alimentaires -- Périodiques; Aliments -- Qualité -- Périodiques; Aliments -- Industrie et commerce -- Qualité -- Contrôle -- Périodiques; Food industry and trade -- Quality control; Food preferences; Food -- Quality; Periodicals; 664
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0950-3293

Abstract

Highlights: Validity and reliability of FCQ tested across 9 European countries. Configural, metric and scalar invariance consistent across 9 countries. All reliability parameters above acceptable levels. Significant agreement in relative importance of food choice factors among countries. FCQ suitable tool to explore food choice motives in different European populations. Abstract: This analysis has been conducted to explore the validity and reliability of the Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) across 9 European countries. Variation in the factor structure and the perceived importance of food choice motives have been compared cross-nationally. Volunteers ( N = 9381) were recruited from an existing panel of a social research agency to take part in the Food4Me survey in Germany, Greece, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, the UK and Norway. The survey was administered on-line. Configural, metric and scalar invariance fell within acceptable limits and were consistent across the 9 countries. All reliability parameters were above acceptable levels. Factor analysis confirmed that all items loaded onto the same 9 factors established by Steptoe and Pollard (1995). There was highly significant agreement in the relative importance of food choice factors between countries. Price was ranked as most important food choice factor in five countries (Spain, Greece, Ireland, Portugal and the Netherlands), sensory appeal was ranked first for three countries (Norway, Germany and the UK) while natural content was ranked as the most important factor in Poland. Familiarity and ethical concern were consistently ranked as least important in all countries. These data suggest that the FCQ is a suitable tool for exploring food choice motives across different European populations. Differences in relative importance of factors within countries may need to be taken into account in dietary health intervention and food product development.