An observational study of an approach to accommodate a fourth-year to third-year neurology clerkship curricular transition. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kraakevik, Jeff A.; Frederick, Meredith; Ryan, Nicole; Haedinger, Leslie A.; Carney, Patricia A.
• Is Part Of: Medical education online. Volume 25:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: Undergraduate Medical Education -- Clerkship Curriculum -- Competency-based education; Medical education -- Periodicals; Education, Medical -- Periodicals; 610.71
• DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1710331
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1087-2981

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background : Curricular transformation can result in bulges in students' clinical placements. Objective : To report on learner outcomes associated with a competency-based opt-out approach for a required 4 th -year neurology clerkship. Methods and Study Design : During Oregon Health & Science University's recent undergraduate medical education curricular transformation, a 4-week required neurology clerkship transitioned from the fourth-year to the third-year in academic year 2016–17. Because this would have resulted in the neurology clerkship accommodating double enrollment for an entire academic year, 4 th year medical students from the prior curriculum (graduating class of 2017) were offered the option of opting-out of the required neurology clerkship if they demonstrated competency by passing the USA National Board of Medical Examiners (US-NBME) clinical neurology subject examination and completing a neurology faculty-observed history and complete neurological examination. Results : Fifty-seven of 133 fourth-year students (42.9%) chose to complete the required neurology clerkship with 77 (57.9%) choosing to opt-out. All opt-out students passed the neurological exam assessment and scored similarly to the students who took the clerkship (US-NBME Neurology Subject Exam mean raw score in the opt-out group 76.9 vs, 77.6; p = 0.61). Students grades did not differ. Students who opted-out tended to pursue surgical careers (e.g., general surgery −10.8% opted-out vs 0% clerkship, OB/GYN – 6.8% opted-out vs 0% clerkship, orthopedic surgery 5.4% opted-out vs 0% clerkship) where those who took the clerkship tended to choose medical residency training disciplines (family medicine −16.1% clerkship vs 10.8% opting-out; internal medicine – 32.1% clerkship vs 14.9% opting-out; psychiatry 10.7% clerkship vs 2.7% opting-out (p = 0.042) Conclusion : While undertaking the neurology clerkship would have been the desired approach, students appear not to have been harmed by the opt-out approach regarding performance on the US-NBME clinical neurology subject exam. Choices regarding opting-out versus taking the neurology clerkship appear to be associated with career choice.