The development of selective stopping: Qualitative and quantitative changes from childhood to early adulthood. Issue 5 (15th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Albert, Jacobo; Rincón‐Pérez, Irene; Sánchez‐Carmona, Alberto J.; Arroyo‐Lozano, Susana; Olmos, Ricardo; Hinojosa, José A.; Fernández‐Jaén, Alberto; López‐Martín, Sara
• Other Names: Chevalier Nicolas guestEditor.; Lipina Sebastián guestEditor.; Scerif Gaia guestEditor.; Segretin M. Soledad guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Developmental science. Volume 25:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-15
• Subjects: cognitive control -- development -- response inhibition -- selective stopping -- SSRT -- strategies; Developmental psychology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 155
• DOI: 10.1111/desc.13210
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1363-755X

Abstract

Abstract: Although progress has been made in elucidating the behavioral and neural development of global stopping across the lifespan, little is known about the development of selective stopping. This more complex form of inhibitory control is required in real‐world situations where ongoing responses must be inhibited to certain stimuli but not others, and can be assessed in laboratory settings using a stimulus selective stopping task. Here we used this task to investigate the qualitative and quantitative developmental changes in selective stopping in a large‐scale cross‐sectional study with three different age groups (children, preadolescents, and young adults). We found that the ability to stop a response selectively to some stimuli (i.e., use a selective strategy) rather than non‐selectively to all presented stimuli (i.e., use a global, non‐selective strategy) is fully mature by early preadolescence, and remains stable afterwards at least until young adulthood. By contrast, the efficiency or speed of stopping (indexed by a shorter stop‐signal reaction time or SSRT) continues to mature throughout adolescence until young adulthood, both for global and selective implementations of stopping. We also provide some preliminary findings regarding which other task variables beyond the strategy and SSRT predicted age group status. Premature responding (an index of "waiting impulsivity") and post‐ignore slowing (an index of cognitive control) were among the most relevant predictors in discriminating between developmental age groups. Although present results need to be confirmed and extended in longitudinal studies, they provide new insights into the development of a relevant form of inhibitory control.