Release and co-release of model hydrophobic and hydrophilic actives from 3D printed kappa-carrageenan emulsion gels. (November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Release and co-release of model hydrophobic and hydrophilic actives from 3D printed kappa-carrageenan emulsion gels. (November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Release and co-release of model hydrophobic and hydrophilic actives from 3D printed kappa-carrageenan emulsion gels
- Authors:
- Kamlow, Michael-Alex
Holt, Thomas
Spyropoulos, Fotis
Mills, Tom - Abstract:
- Abstract: This study formulated and compared 3D printed (3DP) and cast kappa-carrageenan (кC) emulsion gels for the co-release of model lipophilic (cinnamaldehyde) and hydrophilic (erioglaucine disodium salt (EDS)) molecules. Tween 20 (T20) or whey protein isolate (WPI) were used as the emulsifier. Both 3DP and cast emulsion gels maintained their oil droplet size over 8 weeks owing to the set gel matrix. Penetration texture analysis revealed 3DP and cast 5% oil emulsion gels, required more force to break compared to 40% oil gels (3 N against 0.4–0.5 N). This was because the oil droplets, disrupted the gel matrix; thereby weakening it. 3DP gels required less force to break than cast gels, owing to failure between the printed layers. Release tests in various media showed no significant difference in the final % cinnamaldehyde released between 3DP gels and cast gels. Release tests in carried out 0.1M hydrochloric acid saw an increase in cinnamaldehyde release compared to other media, owing to cinnamaldehyde's increased solubility in acidic media. Addition of EDS into the gel matrix facilitated co-release studies, with EDS release having no effect on the cinnamaldehyde release, indicating EDS release was driven by liberation from the gel network and cinnamaldehyde release by its expulsion from the oil droplets. Simple modelling showed that diffusion rather than polymeric relaxation was more dominant for active release in 3DP gels compared to cast gels. This work shows that 3DPAbstract: This study formulated and compared 3D printed (3DP) and cast kappa-carrageenan (кC) emulsion gels for the co-release of model lipophilic (cinnamaldehyde) and hydrophilic (erioglaucine disodium salt (EDS)) molecules. Tween 20 (T20) or whey protein isolate (WPI) were used as the emulsifier. Both 3DP and cast emulsion gels maintained their oil droplet size over 8 weeks owing to the set gel matrix. Penetration texture analysis revealed 3DP and cast 5% oil emulsion gels, required more force to break compared to 40% oil gels (3 N against 0.4–0.5 N). This was because the oil droplets, disrupted the gel matrix; thereby weakening it. 3DP gels required less force to break than cast gels, owing to failure between the printed layers. Release tests in various media showed no significant difference in the final % cinnamaldehyde released between 3DP gels and cast gels. Release tests in carried out 0.1M hydrochloric acid saw an increase in cinnamaldehyde release compared to other media, owing to cinnamaldehyde's increased solubility in acidic media. Addition of EDS into the gel matrix facilitated co-release studies, with EDS release having no effect on the cinnamaldehyde release, indicating EDS release was driven by liberation from the gel network and cinnamaldehyde release by its expulsion from the oil droplets. Simple modelling showed that diffusion rather than polymeric relaxation was more dominant for active release in 3DP gels compared to cast gels. This work shows that 3DP can be used to produce customisable кC-emulsion gels, with multiple actives; suitable for use as modified release vehicles. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: 3D printed and cast emulsion gels maintained droplet stability over 8 weeks. Penetration testing showed 5% oil emulsion gels were stronger than 40%. Cinnamaldehyde released more in acidic released media compared to water and PBS. Hydrophile and lipophile co-release occurred by two different mechanisms. Modelling showed 3D printed gels favoured diffusion driven release over relaxation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Food hydrocolloids. Volume 132(2022)
- Journal:
- Food hydrocolloids
- Issue:
- Volume 132(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 132, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 132
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0132-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11
- Subjects:
- Hydrocolloids -- Periodicals
Food additives -- Periodicals
Colloïdes -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Additifs -- Périodiques
Colloids
Food additives
Periodicals
Electronic journals
664.06 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0268005X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107852 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0268-005X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3977.556000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22237.xml