Consequences of supervisor self-interested behavior: a moderated mediation. Issue 3 (9th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mao, Jih-Yu; Zhang, Ye; Chen, Lifan; Liu, Xin
• Is Part Of: Journal of managerial psychology. Volume 34:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 126
• Page End: 138
• Publication Date: 2019-05-09
• Subjects: Leadership -- Counterproductive work behaviour -- Social exchange; Organizational behavior -- Periodicals; Management -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Psychology, Industrial -- Periodicals; Industrial management -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; 158.7
• DOI: 10.1108/JMP-04-2018-0170
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-3946

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the negative consequences of employee perceptions of supervisor self-interested behavior (SIB). Using social exchange theory, the authors argue that perceived supervisor SIB reduces affective commitment to the supervisor (ACS), which in turn fosters employees' negative reciprocal behavior in the form of counterproductive work behavior – interpersonal (CWBI) and counterproductive work behavior – organizational (CWBO). In addition, the authors identify employee power distance orientation (PDO) as an important contingent factor that influences the indirect effects. Design/methodology/approach: Using a final sample of 441 employees from 146 workgroups across 6 firms in China, the hypotheses are tested using multilevel path analysis to account for the nesting effects. Findings: Perceived supervisor SIB is negatively related to ACS, which in turn is related to employee CWBI and CWBO. Furthermore, employee PDO moderates the indirect effects of perceived supervisor SIB on employee CWBI and CWBO through decreased ACS. Specifically, when employee PDO is low, the indirect effects on employee CWBI and CWBO are stronger. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to investigate the influence of employee perceptions of supervisor SIB on negative employee behavior in the workplace. Furthermore, it furthers our understanding of how negative exchange can stimulate negative reciprocal behavior, which is a relatively underexplored area. Another strength of this paper is the multi-time survey design and the adoption of multilevel path analysis.