Cross-National Study of Mental Health and Employment Status Nine Months Post Social Distancing Implementation Practices. (19th August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cross-National Study of Mental Health and Employment Status Nine Months Post Social Distancing Implementation Practices. (19th August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Cross-National Study of Mental Health and Employment Status Nine Months Post Social Distancing Implementation Practices
- Authors:
- Ruffolo, Mary C
Price, Daicia
Bonsaksen, Tore
Leung, Janni
Schoultz, Mariyana
Thygesen, Hilde
Geirdal, Ostertun - Abstract:
- Abstract: This cross-national study examined the mental health between those individuals working and those not working nine months post initial COVID-19 social distancing implementation. Respondents ( N = 3, 474) were recruited through social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter) and completed an online survey in October/November 2020. The respondents were from Norway, the UK, the USA and Australia. The mental health of those working and not working were analysed using t tests and socio-demographics were compared using one-way analysis of variance. Respondents who were working were significantly more likely to experience better mental health, were younger, report higher levels of education, and significantly less likely to worry about their own situation, health or financial situation than respondents who were not employed. Respondents who were retired reported better mental health than respondents who were not working for other reasons (laid off/dismissed, receiving benefits, studying, other). These findings raise the importance for social workers and other health service providers to monitor the overall mental health of individuals especially when social distancing protocols are in place and as countries begin to recover from the pandemic. Abstract : This cross-national study (Norway, the UK, the USA and Australia) examined the mental health between those individuals working and not working nine months post initial COVID-19 social distancing implementation. The sample ( N =3,Abstract: This cross-national study examined the mental health between those individuals working and those not working nine months post initial COVID-19 social distancing implementation. Respondents ( N = 3, 474) were recruited through social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter) and completed an online survey in October/November 2020. The respondents were from Norway, the UK, the USA and Australia. The mental health of those working and not working were analysed using t tests and socio-demographics were compared using one-way analysis of variance. Respondents who were working were significantly more likely to experience better mental health, were younger, report higher levels of education, and significantly less likely to worry about their own situation, health or financial situation than respondents who were not employed. Respondents who were retired reported better mental health than respondents who were not working for other reasons (laid off/dismissed, receiving benefits, studying, other). These findings raise the importance for social workers and other health service providers to monitor the overall mental health of individuals especially when social distancing protocols are in place and as countries begin to recover from the pandemic. Abstract : This cross-national study (Norway, the UK, the USA and Australia) examined the mental health between those individuals working and not working nine months post initial COVID-19 social distancing implementation. The sample ( N =3, 474) was recruited through social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter). Respondents completed an online survey in October/November 2020. Individuals who were working were significantly more likely to experience better mental health, were younger, report high levels of education and significantly less likely to worry about their own situation, health or financial situation than individuals who were not working. If individuals were retired, they reported better mental health than individuals who were not working for other reasons (e.g. laid off/dismissed, receiving benefits, studying). Based on the findings of this study social workers and other health service providers need to address ways to enhance mental health services especially for individuals who are not working when social distancing protocols are in place. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of social work. Volume 52:Number 4(2022)
- Journal:
- British journal of social work
- Issue:
- Volume 52:Number 4(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 52, Issue 4 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0052-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 2105
- Page End:
- 2124
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08-19
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- cross-national -- employment -- mental health -- social distancing -- unemployment
Social service -- Periodicals
Social workers -- Periodicals
361 - Journal URLs:
- http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjsw/bcab177 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0045-3102
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2324.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22113.xml