Application of Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) viscograms and chemometrics for maize hardness characterisation. (15th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guelpa, Anina; Bevilacqua, Marta; Marini, Federico; O'Kennedy, Kim; Geladi, Paul; Manley, Marena
• Is Part Of: Food chemistry. Volume 173(2015)
• Page Start: 1220
• Page End: 1227
• Publication Date: 2015-04-15
• Subjects: White maize -- Maize hardness -- Milling quality -- Conventional hardness methods -- Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) -- Chemometrics -- Locally weighted partial least squares (LW-PLS) regression; Food -- Analysis -- Periodicals; Food -- Composition -- Periodicals; 664
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.149
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-8146

Abstract

Highlights: This study provides a method to describe maize hardness and milling quality. Rapid Visco Analyser data was used in combination with chemometrics. A LW-PLS2 regression model was used. Maize hardness could be predicted with success. Abstract: It has been established in this study that the Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) can describe maize hardness, irrespective of the RVA profile, when used in association with appropriate multivariate data analysis techniques. Therefore, the RVA can complement or replace current and/or conventional methods as a hardness descriptor. Hardness modelling based on RVA viscograms was carried out using seven conventional hardness methods (hectoliter mass (HLM), hundred kernel mass (HKM), particle size index (PSI), percentage vitreous endosperm (%VE), protein content, percentage chop (%chop) and near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy) as references and three different RVA profiles (hard, soft and standard) as predictors. An approach using locally weighted partial least squares (LW-PLS) was followed to build the regression models. The resulted prediction errors (root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP)) for the quantification of hardness values were always lower or in the same order of the laboratory error of the reference method.