As the number falls, alternatives to the Hagberg–Perten falling number method: A review. Issue 3 (11th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hu, Yang; Sjoberg, Stephanie M.; Chen, Chunpen (James); Hauvermale, Amber L.; Morris, Craig F.; Delwiche, Stephen R.; Cannon, Ashley E.; Steber, Camille M.; Zhang, Zhiwu
• Is Part Of: Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety. Volume 21:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 2105
• Page End: 2117
• Publication Date: 2022-04-11
• Subjects: falling number -- hyperspectral imaging -- immunoassay -- near infrared -- preharvest sprouting -- α‐amylase; Food -- Research -- Periodicals; Food -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; 664.0072
• DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12959
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1541-4337

Abstract

Abstract: This review examines the application, limitations, and potential alternatives to the Hagberg–Perten falling number (FN) method used in the global wheat industry for detecting the risk of poor end‐product quality mainly due to starch degradation by the enzyme α‐amylase. By viscometry, the FN test indirectly detects the presence of α‐amylase, the primary enzyme that digests starch. Elevated α‐amylase results in low FN and damages wheat product quality resulting in cakes that fall, and sticky bread and noodles. Low FN can occur from preharvest sprouting (PHS) and late maturity α‐amylase (LMA). Moist or rainy conditions before harvest cause PHS on the mother plant. Continuously cool or fluctuating temperatures during the grain filling stage cause LMA. Due to the expression of additional hydrolytic enzymes, PHS has a stronger negative impact than LMA. Wheat grain with low FN/high α‐amylase results in serious losses for farmers, traders, millers, and bakers worldwide. Although blending of low FN grain with sound wheat may be used as a means of moving affected grain through the marketplace, care must be taken to avoid grain lots from falling below contract‐specified FN. A large amount of sound wheat can be ruined if mixed with a small amount of sprouted wheat. The FN method is widely employed to detect α‐amylase after harvest. However, it has several limitations, including sampling variability, high cost, labor intensiveness, the destructive nature of the test, and an inability to differentiate between LMA and PHS. Faster, cheaper, and more accurate alternatives could improve breeding for resistance to PHS and LMA and could preserve the value of wheat grain by avoiding inadvertent mixing of high‐ and low‐FN grain by enabling testing at more stages of the value stream including at harvest, delivery, transport, storage, and milling. Alternatives to the FN method explored here include the Rapid Visco Analyzer, enzyme assays, immunoassays, near‐infrared spectroscopy, and hyperspectral imaging.