Predictors of range of motion restrictions in children with spastic cerebral palsy: A registry‐based study. (13th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Almasri, Nihad A.; Gracely, Ed J.; Saleh, Maysoun; Alquaqzeh, Fatima Alzahra
• Is Part Of: Child care health and development. Volume 48:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 396
• Page End: 405
• Publication Date: 2021-12-13
• Subjects: cerebral palsy -- Jordan -- range of motion -- registry; Child development -- Periodicals; Child care -- Periodicals; Children -- Health and hygiene -- Periodicals; Children with disabilities -- Periodicals; 155.405
• DOI: 10.1111/cch.12938
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-1862

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Although children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) commonly present with restricted passive range of motion (PROM) and contractures, knowledge about the child's characteristics that increase the risk of development of restricted PROM is limited. Identifying children who are more likely to develop contractures is important for early detection and the provision of appropriate medical management. This study aims to identify the most commonly restricted PROM of children with spastic CP and (2) to examine the combined effect of a child's age, gender, gross motor functional classification level and CP subtype on the development of restricted PROM in children with spastic CP. Methods: The PROM of 233 children diagnosed with CP was extracted from the national registry of CP in Jordan (CPUP‐Jordan) in addition to information about children's age, gender, level of Gross Motor Function Classification System‐Expanded and Revised (GMFCS‐E&R) and subtype of CP. The mean age of the participants was 3.73 years (SD = 3.14), 57.5% were males and 80.3% had bilateral spastic CP. Point biserial correlations were calculated between the PROM and the child's variables. Multiple binary logistic regressions were conducted to identify the predictors of PROM. Results: Hip abduction was the most common restricted PROM (57.9%), whereas the hip extension was the least (2.1%). Children with older ages demonstrated more restrictions in knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion; males demonstrated more restriction in hip abduction than females; children with lower GMFCS‐E&R levels had more restrictions in hip internal rotation but fewer restrictions in hip abduction and ankle dorsiflexion; and children with bilateral spastic CP had more restrictions in hip abduction than children with unilateral spastic CP. Conclusions: PROM of the hip, knee and ankle joints of children with spastic CP was predicted by different sets of child characteristics. Implications for health professionals and follow‐up registries of children with CP are provided.