Comparability of Postural and Physical Activity Metrics from Different Accelerometer Brands Worn on the Thigh: Data Harmonization Possibilities. Issue 1 (2nd January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Edwardson, Charlotte L; Maylor, Benjamin D; Dawkins, Nathan P; Plekhanova, Tatiana; Rowlands, Alex V
• Is Part Of: Measurement in physical education and exercise science. Volume 26:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 39
• Page End: 50
• Publication Date: 2022-01-02
• Subjects: Activpal -- geneactiv -- axivity -- actigraph -- sedentary behavior -- sitting; Physical fitness -- Testing -- Periodicals; Physical education and training -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Physical education and training -- Research -- Periodicals; 613.7
• DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2021.1944154
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1091-367X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The aim was to establish which postural and physical activity outcomes are comparable across different accelerometer brands worn on the thigh when processed using open-source methods. Twenty participants wore four accelerometers (Axivity, ActiGraph, activPAL, GENEActiv) for three free-living days. Postural and physical activity outputs (average acceleration, intensity gradient, intensity of the most active 30 min, 60 min, and 8 h) were generated. Postural outputs : Mean absolute percent errors (MAPEs) were low, reliability excellent, and equivalency within the 5% zone across all monitor pairings for sitting/lying and upright times, but not specific lying postures. Physical activity outputs : MAPEs were higher and reliability lower than for sitting/lying and upright time. However, the majority of the outcomes were within the 10% equivalency zone for Axivity/GENEActiv and Axivity/ActiGraph pairings. Total sitting/lying and upright times show strong potential for harmonization across studies utilizing different thigh-worn accelerometers. The majority of acceleration outcomes compare well for Axivity, GENEActiv, and ActiGraph.