Review: Ecological awareness, anxiety, and actions among youth and their parents – a qualitative study of newspaper narratives. Issue 1 (22nd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Benoit, Laelia; Thomas, Isaiah; Martin, Andrés
• Other Names: Sanson Ann guestEditor.; Dubicka Bernadka guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Child and adolescent mental health. Volume 27:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 47
• Page End: 58
• Publication Date: 2021-10-22
• Subjects: Eco‐anxiety -- climate change -- children -- adolescents -- parents -- childism -- existential psychology; Adolescent psychology -- Periodicals; Child mental health -- Periodicals; Child psychiatry -- Periodicals; Child psychology -- Periodicals; Teenagers -- Mental health -- Periodicals; 155.405
• DOI: 10.1111/camh.12514
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-357X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Despite the growing impact of climate change on mental health, there have been few studies to date investigating how children and teenagers manage their ecological grief and eco‐anxiety and how they can leverage it into environmental action . In this scoping review, we analyze lay press narratives about how youth respond to climate change to examine the dynamics between minors and adults around the evolving climate crisis. Methods: We included articles published between 2018 and 2021 in six of the top ten American newspapers by circulation about young people during the climate crisis. The 131 articles we selected addressed the attitudes of children, adolescents, and parents toward the climate crisis. We conducted a qualitative analysis based on discourse analysis aided by NVivo software. Results: Newspaper articles commonly categorized children, adolescents, and their respective perspectives and experiences around climate change along four patterns of discourse: (a) fierce young activists; (b) adultified children; (c) innocent victims; and/or (d) ultimate saviors. In turn, articles considered parents and adults in one of four paradigmatic ways: (a) experiencing eco‐anxiety through parenthood; (b) taming children's eco‐anxiety; (c) criticizing youth‐led activism; and/or (d) reimagining climate action as a source of meaning in the lives of young people. Conclusion: Through the framework of childism, or prejudice against children, we conceptualize immature ways for adults to respond to youths' concerns as a defensive stance against overwhelming climate change anxiety. Alternatively, principles of existential psychology can help inform healthier and more productive responses from parents, clinicians, educators, and public health officials as they seek truthful yet supportive responses to address legitimate ecological threats that will disproportionately affect generations to come.