Accounting for the dimensionality of the dependence in analyses of contingency tables obtained with Check-All-That-Apply and Free-Comment. (July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Accounting for the dimensionality of the dependence in analyses of contingency tables obtained with Check-All-That-Apply and Free-Comment. (July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Accounting for the dimensionality of the dependence in analyses of contingency tables obtained with Check-All-That-Apply and Free-Comment
- Authors:
- Mahieu, Benjamin
Visalli, Michel
Schlich, Pascal - Abstract:
- Highlights: A test of dimensionality for correspondence analysis is presented. A Monte-Carlo approach is presented to compute valid p-values for this test. Considering the dimensionality enriches the total bootstrap procedure. Considering the dimensionality enriches the assessment of the product descriptions. Abstract: Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) and Free-Comment (FC) provide a so-called contingency table containing citation counts of words or descriptors (columns) by products (rows). This table is most often analysed using correspondence analysis (CA). CA aims at decomposing dependence between products and descriptors into axes of maximal and decreasing dependencies, which is reasonable if the dependence has been previously established by a chi-square test. However, the p-value of this test is not valid when the observations are not independent or when the contingency table contains too many low expected citation rates. In addition, rejecting independence with a chi-square test only means that at least the first CA axis captures some dependence. This paper presents a test to determine the number of axes of the CA that capture significant dependence and proposes a Monte-Carlo approach to compute valid p-values for this test. The variability in the products' coordinates in the CA space is often evaluated by means of a total bootstrap procedure. The paper proposes to rely on this test to determine the number of axes to consider for the Procrustes rotations of such a procedure.Highlights: A test of dimensionality for correspondence analysis is presented. A Monte-Carlo approach is presented to compute valid p-values for this test. Considering the dimensionality enriches the total bootstrap procedure. Considering the dimensionality enriches the assessment of the product descriptions. Abstract: Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) and Free-Comment (FC) provide a so-called contingency table containing citation counts of words or descriptors (columns) by products (rows). This table is most often analysed using correspondence analysis (CA). CA aims at decomposing dependence between products and descriptors into axes of maximal and decreasing dependencies, which is reasonable if the dependence has been previously established by a chi-square test. However, the p-value of this test is not valid when the observations are not independent or when the contingency table contains too many low expected citation rates. In addition, rejecting independence with a chi-square test only means that at least the first CA axis captures some dependence. This paper presents a test to determine the number of axes of the CA that capture significant dependence and proposes a Monte-Carlo approach to compute valid p-values for this test. The variability in the products' coordinates in the CA space is often evaluated by means of a total bootstrap procedure. The paper proposes to rely on this test to determine the number of axes to consider for the Procrustes rotations of such a procedure. Finally, to investigate which words are cited more often for each product, the paper proposes performing Fisher's exact tests per cell on the derived contingency table obtained by reversing the CA computations on the axes capturing significant dependence. The benefits of accounting for the dimensionality of the dependence in the analyses are demonstrated on real CATA data. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Food quality and preference. Volume 83(2020)
- Journal:
- Food quality and preference
- Issue:
- Volume 83(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 83, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 83
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0083-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07
- Subjects:
- Correspondence analysis -- Dimensionality test -- Monte-Carlo test -- Confidence ellipses -- Chi-square per cell
Food preferences -- Periodicals
Food -- Quality -- Periodicals
Food industry and trade -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Préférences alimentaires -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Qualité -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Industrie et commerce -- Qualité -- Contrôle -- Périodiques
Food industry and trade -- Quality control
Food preferences
Food -- Quality
Periodicals
664 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09503293 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103924 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0950-3293
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3981.865400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19312.xml