A balanced view of mindfulness at work. (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Choi, Ellen; Gruman, Jamie A.; Leonard, Craig M.
• Is Part Of: Organizational psychology review. Volume 12:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 35
• Page End: 72
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: balance -- mindfulness -- too-much-of-a-good-thing -- review -- context -- criticism; Psychology, Industrial -- Periodicals; Organizational behavior -- Periodicals; Psychology, Applied -- Periodicals; 158.705
• DOI: 10.1177/20413866211036930
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2041-3866

Abstract

Mindfulness has grown from an obscure subject to an immensely popular topic that is associated with numerous performance, health, and well-being benefits in organizations. However, this growth in popularity has generated a number of criticisms of mindfulness and a rather piecemeal approach to organizational research and practice on the subject. To advance both investigation and application, the present paper applies The Balance Framework to serve as an integrative scaffolding for considering mindfulness in organizations, helping to address some of the criticisms leveled against it. The Balance Framework specifies five forms of balance: 1) balance as tempered view, 2) balance as mid-range, 3) balance as complementarity, 4) balance as contextual sensitivity, and 5) balance among different levels of consciousness. Each form is applied to mindfulness at work with a discussion of relevant conceptual issues in addition to implications for research and practice. Plain Language Summary: In order to appreciate the value of mindfulness at work researchers and practitioners might want to consider both the benefits and potential drawbacks of mindfulness. This paper presents a discussion of both the advantages and possible disadvantages of mindfulness at work organized in terms of the five dimensions of an organizing structure called The Balance Framework .