Comparing Direct and Indirect Branding in Advertising. Issue 1 (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hartnett, Nicole; Romaniuk, Jenni; Kennedy, Rachel
• Is Part Of: Australasian marketing journal. Volume 24:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 20
• Page End: 28
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Brand name -- Brand elements -- Advertising effectiveness -- Brand recall -- Advertising likeability -- Experiment; Marketing -- Australasia -- Periodicals; Marketing -- Periodicals; 658.8480905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2015.12.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1441-3582

Abstract

Advertising research has largely neglected to evaluate the relative effectiveness of the different forms of branding devices available to advertisers. Branding can be direct, through explicit use of brand names, or indirect, through use of (non-brand name) brand elements, such as logos, spokes-characters and slogans that are connected to the brand in consumers' memory. Advertisers often downplay brand names in favour of brand elements because the latter are seen as less intrusive and more creative. This experiment in three categories demonstrates that direct branding often produces higher brand recall than indirect branding without compromising advertising likeability. There is, however, a clear picture-superiority effect, whereby picture elements (logos, spokes-characters) consistently elicit higher brand recall than text elements (slogans). The findings highlight that advertisers need not be reluctant to call out the brand name for fear of losing attention due to an unappealing ad, because consumers do not appear to penalise advertising with direct branding, nor do they reward advertising with subtler indirect branding.