Observational study of the relationship between nurse staffing levels and compliance with mandatory nutritional assessments in hospital. Issue 4 (6th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Recio‐Saucedo, A.; Smith, G. B.; Redfern, O.; Maruotti, A.; Griffiths, P.
• Other Names: Griffiths Peter investigator.; Ball Jane investigator.; Bloor Karen investigator.; Böhning Dankmar investigator.; Briggs Jim investigator.; Dall'Ora Chiara investigator.; De Iongh Anya investigator.; Jones Jeremy investigator.; Kovacs Caroline investigator.; Maruotti Antonello investigator.; Meredith Paul investigator.; Recio‐Saucedo Alejandra investigator.; Prytherch David investigator.; Redfern Oliver investigator.; Schmidt Paul investigator.; Sinden Nicky investigator.; Smith Gary investigator.
• Is Part Of: Journal of human nutrition and dietetics. Volume 34:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 679
• Page End: 686
• Publication Date: 2021-01-06
• Subjects: hospital care -- missed care -- nursing workforce -- nutrition assessments -- patient outcomes; Dietetics -- Periodicals; Nutrition -- Periodicals; 613.205
• DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12847
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0952-3871

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In the UK, it is recommended that hospital patients have their nutritional status assessed within 24 h of admission using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). The present study aimed to examine the association between nurse staffing levels and missed nutritional status assessments. Methods: A single‐centre, retrospective, observational study was employed using routinely collected MUST assessments from 32 general adult hospital wards over 2 years, matched to ward nurse staffing levels. We used mixed‐effects logistic regression to control for ward characteristics and patient factors. Results: Of 43 451 instances where staffing levels could be linked to a patient for whom an assessment was due, 21.4% had no MUST score recorded within 24 h of admission. Missed assessments varied between wards (8–100%). There was no overall association between registered nurse staffing levels and missed assessments; although higher admissions per registered nurse were associated with more missed assessments [odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, P = 0.005]. Higher healthcare assistant staffing was associated with lower rates of missed assessments (OR = 0.80, P < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between registered nurses and healthcare assistants staffing levels (OR = 0.97, P = 0.011). Conclusions: Despite a written hospital policy requiring a nutritional assessment within 24 h of admission, missed assessments were common. The observed results show that compliance with the policy for routine MUST assessments within 24 h of hospital admission is sensitive to staffing levels and workload. This has implications for planning nurse staffing. Abstract : Negative patient outcomes associated with malnutrition in hospital patients can be avoided by ensuring that every patient has a nutritional assessment completed and recorded, leading to appropriate interventions aimed at avoiding preventable deterioration. However, research shows missed nutritional assessments with lower levels of nurses in hospital wards. The findings from an observational study using administrative routinely collected data on the prevalence of missed nutritional assessments in a hospital in England show that compliance with the policy for routine Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) assessment within 24 h of hospital admission is sensitive to staffing levels and workload. This has implications for planning nurse staffing.