Robustness of Latent Profile Analysis to Measurement Noninvariance Between Profiles. (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Yan; Kim, Eunsook; Yi, Zhiyao
• Is Part Of: Educational and psychological measurement. Volume 82:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 5
• Page End: 28
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: latent profile analysis -- composite scores -- factor scores -- measurement noninvariance -- factor mixture modeling; Educational tests and measurements -- Periodicals; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; 151.205
• DOI: 10.1177/0013164421997896
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0013-1644

Abstract

Latent profile analysis (LPA) identifies heterogeneous subgroups based on continuous indicators that represent different dimensions. It is a common practice to measure each dimension using items, create composite or factor scores for each dimension, and use these scores as indicators of profiles in LPA. In this case, measurement models for dimensions are not included and potential noninvariance across latent profiles is not modeled in LPA. This simulation study examined the robustness of LPA in terms of class enumeration and parameter recovery when the noninvariance was unmodeled by using composite or factor scores as profile indicators. Results showed that correct class enumeration rates of LPA were relatively high with small degree of noninvariance, large class separation, large sample size, and equal proportions. Severe bias in profile indicator mean difference was observed with intercept and loading noninvariance, respectively. Implications for applied researchers are discussed.