Advancing Allyship Through Anti-Oppression Workshops for Public Health Students: A Mixed Methods Pilot Evaluation. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Djulus, Gifty; Sheikhan, Natasha Y.; Nawaz, Emin; Burley, Joseph; Thomas-Jacques, Tyla; Naik, Harsh; Warsame, Kahiye; Jamil, Marium; Banerjee, Ananya
• Other Names: Bentley Kelly M. guest-editor.; Fortune Deborah guest-editor.; Rooks Ronica guest-editor.; Walter Gayle guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Pedagogy in health promotion. Volume 7:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 304
• Page End: 312
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: health promotion -- health equity -- public health -- graduate student; Health promotion -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Health education -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Public health -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; 613.071
• DOI: 10.1177/2373379920962410
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2373-3799

Abstract

This pilot mixed methods evaluation describes the impact of an anti-oppression workshop on allyship development among a group of public health graduate students. After completing a mandatory anti-oppression workshop, a survey including closed- and open-ended questions was administered to 41 public health students specializing in health promotion. Closed-ended questions gathered basic demographic data and Likert-type scale responses to assess changes in participant knowledge, awareness, and attitudes surrounding anti-oppression concepts discussed during the workshop, while open-ended questions asked respondents to reflect on how such changes might influence their development as allies. A response rate of 65.85% (27 respondents) was achieved. The majority of the study group were between the ages of 20 and 24 years (74.07%), self-identified as straight (77.8%), and self-identified as non-White (77.8%), while almost the entire group identified as female (92.59%). Five key themes emerged from a directed content analysis of qualitative data, identifying the importance of anti-oppression workshops for allyship development: conducive environments, positionality, knowledge, active listening and learning, and advocacy. These themes were used to construct a mixed methods joint display for comparative interpretation of quantitative and qualitative data. Mixed methods analysis revealed that anti-oppression workshops can promote allyship development by increasing knowledge of key terms and concepts associated with anti-oppression and facilitating critical reflections on power, privilege, and social location. Our findings demonstrate a profound need for ongoing anti-oppression training among future public health students and professionals.