A 4-tier rubric for evaluating engineering students' ethical decision-making (EDM) skills: EDM model as a tool for analysing and assessing ethical reasoning. Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sivaraman, Mathana Amaris Fiona
• Is Part Of: Australasian journal of engineering education. Volume 26:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 77
• Page End: 92
• Publication Date: 2021-01-02
• Subjects: Engineering students -- ethical decision-making (EDM) -- ethical decision-making model (EDMM) -- ethical reasoning -- ethical vignette -- rubric; Engineering -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Australia -- Periodicals; Engineers -- Training of -- Australia -- Periodicals; Engineering -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Periodicals; Engineers -- Training of -- Periodicals; 620.0071094
• DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2021.1909811
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2205-4952

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Ethical decision-making (EDM) is an important element in the engineering profession. This paper explores the use of an ethical decision-making model (EDMM) as a tool for analysing and assessing the ethical reasoning skills of student engineers and their ability to apply the rationale of EDM process for ethical vignettes. The tool, distilled from several existing EDMMs, was tested against interview data collected from 12 graduating students at one private university in Malaysia. The students were asked to examine two ethical vignettes of varying scenarios and difficulty levels. This was followed by a semi-structured, face-to-face interview (corresponding to the first four steps of EDMM) to gauge their ethical reasoning behind their decision for each vignette. Their verbal responses were analysed and categorised into a four-tier rubric developed in accordance with the four steps of EDMM. Findings revealed that generally, students were able to identify the underlying issue (step 1) and the affected parties and the consequences (step 2), but they did not give much thought to potential course of action (step 3) or to testing available options (step 4). Levels of development of ethical reasoning provided by students varied between the first and second vignette. Findings suggest that the EDMM holds promise as a way to better understand and diagnose students' readiness to face ethical challenges in their profession.