Läxhjälp as Shadow Education in Sweden: The Logic of Equality in "A School for All". (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Forsberg, Eva; Hallsén, Stina; Karlsson, Marie; Bowden, Helen Melander; Mikhaylova, Tatiana; Svahn, Johanna
• Other Names: Christensen Søren guest-editor.; Zhang (张薇) Wei guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: ECNU review of education. Volume 4:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 494
• Page End: 519
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Boundary object -- curriculum theory -- homework support -- identities -- interaction -- shadow education; Education -- China -- Periodicals; Education -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 370.951
• DOI: 10.1177/2096531120966334
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2096-5311

Abstract

Purpose: Taking läxhjälp/homework support in Sweden as a case, this article aims to further explore shadow education, especially as a pedagogical object from curriculum theory perspective. Design/Approach/Methods: Approaches including policy analyses, ethnomethodological work based on video-recorded interaction, and narratives have produced empirically grounded knowledge. We use examples from several substudies and analyze the reentry and regulation of supplementary education and how tutors and tutees interact in tutoring settings and negotiate identities in läxhjälp as well as the relation to regular schooling. Findings: Läxhjälp is conditioned by the logic of equality and changes in the governance of läxhjälp. The proliferation of different kinds of tutoring practices provided by various organizations calls for a broad definition of shadow education. With curriculum as boundary object, equality and academic success are foundational. Different settings and spatiotemporal arrangements affect modes of interaction, distribution of epistemic authority, and negotiations of identities. Originality/Value: With Sweden as a case, it is possible to explore shadow education in a new context, the Scandinavian welfare state, and its history of comprehensive education. Moreover, ethnomethodological interaction and narrative studies and curriculum perspectives are seldom employed within research on shadow education. A number of critical key boundary objects are identified.