Validation Testing Demonstrates Efficacy of a 7-Day Fluid Record to Estimate Daily Water Intake in Adult Men and Women When Compared with Total Body Water Turnover Measurement. Issue 10 (6th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, Evan C; Péronnet, François; Jansen, Lisa T; Capitan-Jiménez, Catalina; Adams, JD; Guelinckx, Isabelle; Jiménez, Liliana; Mauromoustakos, Andy; Kavouras, Stavros A
• Is Part Of: Journal of nutrition. Volume 147:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: 2001
• Page End: 2007
• Publication Date: 2017-09-06
• Subjects: deuterium oxide -- water turnover -- dietary assessment -- hydration -- fluid intake -- diet record -- water -- Liq.in7 -- 7-day record; Nutrition -- Periodicals; Diet -- Periodicals; 613.205
• DOI: 10.3945/jn.117.253377
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3166

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Mean daily water intake from fluids (WATER-FL) has proven to be difficult to measure because of a range of nonvalidated data collection techniques. Few questionnaires have been validated to estimate WATER-FL against self-reported diaries or urinary hydration markers, which may limit their objectivity. Objectives: The goals of this investigation were 1 ) to assess the validity of a 7-d fluid record (7dFLR) to measure WATER-FL (WATER-FL-7dFLR) through comparison with WATER-FL as calculated by measuring deuterium oxide (D2 O) disappearance (WATER-FL-D2 O), and 2 ) to evaluate the reliability of the 7dFLR in measuring WATER-FL. Methods: Participants [ n = 96; 51% female; mean ± SD age: 41 ± 14 y; mean ± SD body mass index (in kg/m 2 ): 26.2 ± 5.1] completed body water turnover analysis over 3 consecutive weeks. They completed the 7dFLR and food diaries during weeks 2 and 4 of the observation. The records were entered into nutritional software to determine the water content of all foods and fluids consumed. WATER-FL-D2 O was calculated from water turnover (via the D2 O dilution method), minus water from food and metabolic water. The agreement between the 2 methods of determining WATER-FL were compared according to a Bland-Altman plot at week 2. The test-retest reliability of 7dFLR between weeks 2 and 4 was assessed via intraclass correlation (ICC). Results: The mean ± SD difference between WATER-FL-7dFLR and WATER-FL-D2 O was −131 ± 845 mL/d. In addition, no bias was observed ( F [1, 94] = 0.484; R 2 = 0.006; P = 0.488). When comparing WATER-FL-7dFLR from weeks 2 and 4, no significant difference (mean ± SD difference: 71 ± 75 mL/d; t [79] = 0.954; P = 0.343) and an ICC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.90) was observed. Conclusions: The main findings of this study were that the use of the 7dFLR is an effective and reliable method to estimate WATER-FL in adults. This style of questionnaire may be extremely helpful for collecting water intake data for large-scale epidemiologic studies.