Multiple symbolic representations: The combination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic. (December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Multiple symbolic representations: The combination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic. (December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Multiple symbolic representations: The combination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic
- Authors:
- Ott, Natalie
Brünken, Roland
Vogel, Markus
Malone, Sarah - Abstract:
- Abstract: As multiple representations are common in math education, we examined different combinations of representations (text, formula, graphic) in the field of propositional logic. In two experiments, we investigated whether participants benefit from multiple representations, and whether the kind of representational combination affects performance. For the first experiment, 146 university students were divided into six groups: two single-representation groups (text or formula), three dual-representation groups (all possible pairs), and one triple-representation group. Results indicate that the combination of multiple symbolic representations (text + formula) was as helpful as combining analog and symbolic representations (text + graphic and text + formula + graphic): the participants provided with all such types of multiple representations outperformed all single representation groups. In a second experiment ( N = 19, within-subjects) we compared the gaze behavior when working with multiple symbolic representations (text + formula) or combined symbolic and analog representations (text + graphic). The results demonstrate that text was the one representation that was attended most and can therefore be regarded as the reference representation in all useful combinations. Even though fewer gaze switches were observed between text and formulas than between text and graphics, performance (time on task and accuracy) did not differ. This research emphasizes the importance ofAbstract: As multiple representations are common in math education, we examined different combinations of representations (text, formula, graphic) in the field of propositional logic. In two experiments, we investigated whether participants benefit from multiple representations, and whether the kind of representational combination affects performance. For the first experiment, 146 university students were divided into six groups: two single-representation groups (text or formula), three dual-representation groups (all possible pairs), and one triple-representation group. Results indicate that the combination of multiple symbolic representations (text + formula) was as helpful as combining analog and symbolic representations (text + graphic and text + formula + graphic): the participants provided with all such types of multiple representations outperformed all single representation groups. In a second experiment ( N = 19, within-subjects) we compared the gaze behavior when working with multiple symbolic representations (text + formula) or combined symbolic and analog representations (text + graphic). The results demonstrate that text was the one representation that was attended most and can therefore be regarded as the reference representation in all useful combinations. Even though fewer gaze switches were observed between text and formulas than between text and graphics, performance (time on task and accuracy) did not differ. This research emphasizes the importance of various forms of multiple representations in mathematics learning and assessment, and sheds light on how different kinds of representations and their combinations are processed. Highlights: Multiple representations can foster problem solving in mathematics. Two experiments investigated the multimedia effect for multiple symbolic representations. The combination of formula and text fostered problem solving in propositional logic. Combining text and formula was as helpful as the combination of text and graphic. Eye tracking confirms text to be the reference representation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Learning and instruction. Volume 58(2018)
- Journal:
- Learning and instruction
- Issue:
- Volume 58(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 58, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 58
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0058-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 88
- Page End:
- 105
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12
- Subjects:
- Multiple symbolic representations -- Multimedia effect -- Mathematics -- Elementary propositional logic -- Eye tracking
Learning -- Periodicals
Teaching -- Periodicals
Apprentissage -- Périodiques
Enseignement -- Périodiques
Learning
Teaching
Periodicals
Electronic journals
370.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09594752 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.010 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-4752
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5179.325890
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16619.xml