Mutual influences between numerical and non-numerical quantities in comparison tasks. Issue 5 (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hendryckx, Charlotte; Guillaume, Mathieu; Beuel, Anthony; Van Rinsveld, Amandine; Content, Alain
• Is Part Of: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. Volume 74:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 843
• Page End: 852
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: Number sense -- approximate number system; Psychology, Experimental -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 150.72405
• DOI: 10.1177/1747021820981876
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-0218

Abstract

Humans possess a numerical intuition that allows them to manipulate large non-symbolic quantities. This ability has been broadly assessed with the help of number comparison tasks involving simultaneously displayed arrays. Many authors pointed out that the manipulation (or the lack thereof) of non-numerical features deeply impacts performance in these tasks, but the specific nature of this influence is not clear. This study investigates the interaction between numerical and non-numerical quantity judgement tasks. Adult participants performed five distinct comparison tasks, each based on a target dimension: numerosity, total area, dot size, convex hull, and mean occupancy. We manipulated the relation between the target and the other dimensions to measure their respective influence on task performance. Results showed that total area and convex hull substantially affected numerosity comparisons. The number of dots conversely acted as an informative dimension when participants had to make a decision based on the total area or the convex hull. Our results illustrate that adults flexibly use non-target dimensions as visual cues to perform comparison judgements. Overall, this suggests that the influence found in numerical comparison tasks is explicit and deliberate rather than due to implicit visual integration processes.