Turning 'evidence for development' on its head: A view from Africa. (16th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stewart, Ruth
• Is Part Of: Research for all. Volume 5:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 174
• Page End: 187
• Publication Date: 2021-02-16
• Subjects: evidence-informed -- evidence-based -- global South -- inclusion -- decoloniality; Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Interdisciplinary research -- Periodicals; 001.4
• DOI: 10.14324/RFA.05.1.13
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2399-8121

Abstract

Abstract : page_174 other The 'evidence for development' community aims to produce research that is useful and used to address issues of poverty and inequality, largely in low- and middle-income countries (often referred to as the 'global South'). The unspoken norm, however, is that much of the engagement, funding and attention is focused on organizations and individuals in the global North, with the assumption that they are effective in supporting the needs of the global South. In this research paper, I explore the initiatives and the individuals and organizations that are working within the 'evidence for development' community in Africa, using the lens of the African philosophy of ubuntu. I present findings from a programme of work undertaken across Africa to identify and better understand the innovation in evidence-informed decision-making taking place across the continent. I demonstrate that, while resource-poor and not well publicized, the evidence community in Africa is world leading in a number of respects. These include the interconnections within its continent-wide network, and the engagement of some governments within its ecosystem. Reflecting on these findings, I discuss and critique the underlying foundations of patriarchy, development and coloniality that shape the field of 'evidence for development'. I highlight how, in an era of decoloniality, post-'development' and antipatriarchy, the 'evidence for development' community risks becoming outdated and being ineffective if it does not engage with the challenges inherent within these concepts. I argue that using the alternative lens of ubuntu enables us to celebrate the successes of Southern evidence communities, and to work together on a level footing with the North to tackle the challenges of poverty and inequality through better use of evidence.