Physicochemical and pH-dependent functional properties of proteins isolated from eight traditional Chinese beans. (March 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Physicochemical and pH-dependent functional properties of proteins isolated from eight traditional Chinese beans. (March 2021)
- Main Title:
- Physicochemical and pH-dependent functional properties of proteins isolated from eight traditional Chinese beans
- Authors:
- Ge, Jiao
Sun, Cui-Xia
Mata, Analucia
Corke, Harold
Gan, Ren-You
Fang, Yapeng - Abstract:
- Abstract: Mung bean (MPI), black bean (BPI), adzuki bean (API), rice bean (RPI), black kidney bean (BKPI), speckled kidney bean (SKPI), chickpea (CPI) and cowpea (CPPI) protein isolates were assessed for their surface (charge, hydrophobicity: H0 and tension) and functional properties (solubility, water/oil holding capacity, WHC/OHC; foaming capacity/stability, FC/FS; emulsifying activity/stability indices, EAI/ESI and least gelling capacity, LGC) at pH 3.0, 5.0, 7.0 and 9.0, using soybean (SPI) and pea (PPI) protein isolates as controls. Physicochemical properties of these proteins, e.g., amino acid composition and colour ( L *, a * & b *, WI: whiteness index), were also characterized. API, RPI, BKPI, SKPI and CCPI exhibited a better amino acid profile and protein digestibility than other isolates. BKPI (27.01) and SKPI (20.48) showed higher WI, while CPI (−21.92) was the lowest. For all isolates, H0 was the highest at pH 3.0, followed by pH 7.0 and 9.0, while surface tension was the highest at pH 5.0, followed by pH 3.0. Compared to other proteins, BKPI and SKPI showed lower solubility, but were more effective to reduce surface tension. Most of the traditional legume proteins had similar EAI. CCPI showed better WHC/OHC and API, RPI, BKPI and SKPI displayed excellent FC/FS. Interestingly, LGCs of MPI (8%), BKPI (4%), SKPI (4%) and CCPI (6%) at pH 3.0 were significantly lower than other isolates (12%). Overall, BKPI and SKPI have good nutritional profiles and also possessAbstract: Mung bean (MPI), black bean (BPI), adzuki bean (API), rice bean (RPI), black kidney bean (BKPI), speckled kidney bean (SKPI), chickpea (CPI) and cowpea (CPPI) protein isolates were assessed for their surface (charge, hydrophobicity: H0 and tension) and functional properties (solubility, water/oil holding capacity, WHC/OHC; foaming capacity/stability, FC/FS; emulsifying activity/stability indices, EAI/ESI and least gelling capacity, LGC) at pH 3.0, 5.0, 7.0 and 9.0, using soybean (SPI) and pea (PPI) protein isolates as controls. Physicochemical properties of these proteins, e.g., amino acid composition and colour ( L *, a * & b *, WI: whiteness index), were also characterized. API, RPI, BKPI, SKPI and CCPI exhibited a better amino acid profile and protein digestibility than other isolates. BKPI (27.01) and SKPI (20.48) showed higher WI, while CPI (−21.92) was the lowest. For all isolates, H0 was the highest at pH 3.0, followed by pH 7.0 and 9.0, while surface tension was the highest at pH 5.0, followed by pH 3.0. Compared to other proteins, BKPI and SKPI showed lower solubility, but were more effective to reduce surface tension. Most of the traditional legume proteins had similar EAI. CCPI showed better WHC/OHC and API, RPI, BKPI and SKPI displayed excellent FC/FS. Interestingly, LGCs of MPI (8%), BKPI (4%), SKPI (4%) and CCPI (6%) at pH 3.0 were significantly lower than other isolates (12%). Overall, BKPI and SKPI have good nutritional profiles and also possess excellent functionalities (except for WHC/OHC), which are very promising as new alternative legume proteins to SPI and PPI. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Compared nutritional value of eight proteins by amino acid results. First compared functional properties of eight proteins at pH 3.0, 5.0, 7.0 and 9.0. API, RPI, BKPI and SKPI exhibited better foaming capacity/stability. MPI, BKPI, SKPI and CCPI exhibited much stronger gelling capacity at pH 3.0. BKPI and SKPI showed good nutritional value and superior functional properties. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Food hydrocolloids. Volume 112(2021)
- Journal:
- Food hydrocolloids
- Issue:
- Volume 112(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 112, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 112
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0112-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-03
- Subjects:
- Legume protein -- Amino acid -- pH -- Surface characteristics -- Functional properties
Hydrocolloids -- Periodicals
Food additives -- Periodicals
Colloïdes -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Additifs -- Périodiques
Colloids
Food additives
Periodicals
Electronic journals
664.06 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0268005X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106288 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0268-005X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3977.556000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15183.xml