Comparison of classical multi-locus sequence typing software for next-generation sequencing data. Issue 8 (4th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Page, Andrew J.; Alikhan, Nabil-Fareed; Carleton, Heather A.; Seemann, Torsten; Keane, Jacqueline A.; Katz, Lee S.
• Is Part Of: Microbial genomics. Volume 3:Issue 8(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-07-04
• Subjects: MLST -- multi-locus sequence typing -- software comparison -- next-generation sequencing; Microbial genomics -- Periodicals; 572.8629
• DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000124
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2057-5858

Abstract

Abstract : Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) is a widely used method for categorizing bacteria. Increasingly, MLST is being performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data by reference laboratories and for clinical diagnostics. Many software applications have been developed to calculate sequence types from NGS data; however, there has been no comprehensive review to date on these methods. We have compared eight of these applications against real and simulated data, and present results on: (1) the accuracy of each method against traditional typing methods, (2) the performance on real outbreak datasets, (3) the impact of contamination and varying depth of coverage, and (4) the computational resource requirements.