Negative effect of turbidity on prey capture for both visual and non‐visual aquatic predators. Issue 11 (26th September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Negative effect of turbidity on prey capture for both visual and non‐visual aquatic predators. Issue 11 (26th September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Negative effect of turbidity on prey capture for both visual and non‐visual aquatic predators
- Authors:
- Ortega, Jean C. G.
Figueiredo, Bruno R. S.
da Graça, Weferson J.
Agostinho, Angelo A.
Bini, Luis M. - Editors:
- O'Gorman, Eoin
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Turbidity plays an important role in aquatic predator–prey interactions. Increases in turbidity are expected to reduce prey capture rates, especially for visually oriented predators. However, there is also evidence indicating that turbidity may have little or no effect on predation rates. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the relationship between turbidity and capture rate. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity in the effect sizes (capture strategy, predator's body size, relative eye size and turbidity range in the experiments) while controlling for the dependence among effects sizes and phylogenetic relationships among predator species. We found a consistent negative effect of turbidity on prey capture and that turbidity range (manipulated in the experiments) was the main factor accounting for between‐study variation in effect sizes. Also, capture rates of both visually and non‐visually oriented predators decreased with an increase in turbidity. In addition, for visually oriented fish predators, the relative eye size did not influence the effect sizes. Despite the paucity of studies for some groups of aquatic predators (mainly in tropical regions), we provide corroborative evidence that turbidity is a critical environmental factor controlling predator–prey interactions. This result is especially relevant considering that changes in turbidity is a human‐induced pervasive environmental alteration resulted from, among otherAbstract: Turbidity plays an important role in aquatic predator–prey interactions. Increases in turbidity are expected to reduce prey capture rates, especially for visually oriented predators. However, there is also evidence indicating that turbidity may have little or no effect on predation rates. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the relationship between turbidity and capture rate. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity in the effect sizes (capture strategy, predator's body size, relative eye size and turbidity range in the experiments) while controlling for the dependence among effects sizes and phylogenetic relationships among predator species. We found a consistent negative effect of turbidity on prey capture and that turbidity range (manipulated in the experiments) was the main factor accounting for between‐study variation in effect sizes. Also, capture rates of both visually and non‐visually oriented predators decreased with an increase in turbidity. In addition, for visually oriented fish predators, the relative eye size did not influence the effect sizes. Despite the paucity of studies for some groups of aquatic predators (mainly in tropical regions), we provide corroborative evidence that turbidity is a critical environmental factor controlling predator–prey interactions. This result is especially relevant considering that changes in turbidity is a human‐induced pervasive environmental alteration resulted from, among other mechanisms, runoff after deforestation, eutrophication or oligotrophication in reservoir cascades, which imply changes in predator–prey interactions. Abstract : This meta‐analysis shows that turbidity reduces prey capture by aquatic predators with different predation strategies. Only the range in turbidity explains differences among experiments. These results highlight that turbidity drives predator‐prey dynamics in aquatic environments and draws attention to current and projected changes in water transparency caused by anthropogenic activities. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of animal ecology. Volume 89:Issue 11(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of animal ecology
- Issue:
- Volume 89:Issue 11(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 89, Issue 11 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 89
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0089-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 2427
- Page End:
- 2439
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-26
- Subjects:
- freshwater -- marine -- meta‐analysis -- predation -- predator–prey interactions -- water transparency
Animal ecology -- Periodicals
591.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jstor.org/journals/00218790.html ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117960113/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0021-8790;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/1365-2656.13329 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0021-8790
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4936.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14703.xml