Functional traits explain trophic allometries of cephalopods. Issue 11 (28th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Murphy, Kieran J.; Pecl, Gretta T.; Richards, Shane A.; Semmens, Jayson M.; Revill, Andrew T.; Suthers, Iain M.; Everett, Jason D.; Trebilco, Rowan; Blanchard, Julia L.
• Editors: O'Gorman, Eoin
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal ecology. Volume 89:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: 2692
• Page End: 2703
• Publication Date: 2020-09-28
• Subjects: food web -- mesopelagic -- octopus -- ontogenetic diet shift -- predator–prey interaction -- size spectrum -- squid -- trophodynamics; Animal ecology -- Periodicals; 591.7
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13333
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8790

Abstract

Abstract: Individual body size strongly influences the trophic role of marine organisms and the structure and function of marine ecosystems. Quantifying trophic position–individual body size relationships (trophic allometries) underpins the development of size‐structured ecosystem models to predict abundance and the transfer of energy through ecosystems. Trophic allometries are well studied for fishes but remain relatively unexplored for cephalopods. Cephalopods are important components of coastal, oceanic and deep‐sea ecosystems, and they play a key role in the transfer of biomass from low trophic positions to higher predators. It is therefore important to resolve cephalopod trophic allometries to accurately represent them within size‐structured ecosystem models. We assessed the trophic positions of cephalopods in an oceanic pelagic (0–500 m) community (sampled by trawling in a cold‐core eddy in the western Tasman Sea), comprising 22 species from 12 families, using bulk tissue stable isotope analysis and amino acid compound‐specific stable isotope analysis. We assessed whether ontogenetic trophic position shifts were evident at the species‐level and tested for the best predictor of community‐level trophic allometry among body size, taxonomy and functional grouping (informed by fin and mantle morphology). Individuals in this cephalopod community spanned two trophic positions and fell into three functional groups on an activity level gradient: low, medium and high. The relationship between trophic position and ontogeny varied among species, with the most marked differences evident between species from different functional groups. Activity‐level‐based functional group and individual body size are best explained by cephalopod trophic positions (marginal R 2 = 0.43). Our results suggest that the morphological traits used to infer activity level, such as fin‐to‐mantle length ratio, fin musculature and mantle musculature are strong predictors of cephalopod trophic allometries. Contrary to established theory, not all cephalopods are voracious predators. Low activity level cephalopods have a distinct feeding mode, with low trophic positions and little‐to‐no ontogenetic increases. Given the important role of cephalopods in marine ecosystems, distinct feeding modes could have important consequences for energy pathways and ecosystem structure and function. These findings will facilitate trait‐based and other model estimates of cephalopod abundance in the changing global ocean. Abstract : The authors found that oceanic cephalopods have distinct trophic roles, which are explained by body size and activity level. This insight will improve our capacity to understand the structure and function of marine ecosystems.