Blood product transfusion during air medical transport: A needs assessment. (September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: MacDonald, Russell D.; Ramjaun, Aliya
• Editors: Tien, Homer; MacDonald, Russell
• Is Part Of: CJEM. Volume 22(2020)Supplement 2
• Page Start: S67
• Page End: S73
• Publication Date: 2020-09
• Subjects: Air medical, -- blood, -- hemorrhagic shock, -- prehospital emergency care; Emergency Treatment -- Periodicals; Emergency Medicine -- Periodicals; Emergency medical services -- Canada -- Periodicals; Medical emergencies -- Canada -- Periodicals; Emergency medical services; Medical emergencies; Canada; Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1481-8035

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Early administration of blood products to patients with hemorrhagic shock has a positive impact on morbidity and mortality. Smaller hospitals may have limited supply of blood, and air medical systems may not carry blood. The primary outcome is to quantify the number of patients meeting established physiologic criteria for blood product administration and to identify which patients receive and which ones do not receive it due to lack of availability locally. Methods: Electronic patient care records were used to identify a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing emergent air medical transport in Ontario, Canada, who are likely to require blood. Presenting problems for blood product administration were identified. Physiologic data were extracted with criteria for transfusion used to identify patients where blood product administration is indicated. Results: There were 11, 520 emergent patient transports during the study period, with 842 (7.3%) where blood product administration was considered. Of these, 290 met established physiologic criteria for blood products, with 167 receiving blood, of which 57 received it at a hospital with a limited supply. The mean number of units administered per patient was 3.5. The remaining 123 patients meeting criteria did not receive product because none was unavailable. Conclusion: Indications for blood product administration are present in 2.5% of patients undergoing time-sensitive air medical transport. Air medical services can enhance access to potentially lifesaving therapy in patients with hemorrhagic shock by carrying blood products, as blood may be unavailable or in limited supply locally in the majority of patients where it is indicated.