Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval. Issue 12 (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kubik, Veit; Jönsson, Fredrik U; de Jonge, Mario; Arshamian, Artin
• Is Part Of: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. Volume 73:Issue 12(2020)
• Page Start: 2093
• Page End: 2105
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Enacted retrieval -- covert retrieval -- testing effect -- enactment effect -- production effect; Psychology, Experimental -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 150.72405
• DOI: 10.1177/1747021820945560
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-0218

Abstract

Retrieval practice improves long-term retention. However, it is currently debated if this testing effect can be further enhanced by overtly producing recalled responses. We addressed this issue using a standard cued-recall testing-effect paradigm with verb–noun action phrases (e.g., water the plant ) to prompt motor actions as a specifically powerful response format of recall. We then tested whether motorically performing the recalled verb targets (e.g., ?–the plant ) during an initial recall test ( enacted retrieval ) led to better long-term retention than silently retrieving them ( covert retrieval ) or restudying the complete verb–noun phrases ( restudy ). The results demonstrated a direct testing effect, in that long-term retention was enhanced for covert retrieval practice compared to restudy practice. Critically, enactment during retrieval further improved long-term retention beyond the effect of covert memory retrieval, both in a congruent noun-cued recall test after 1 week (Experiment 1) and in an incongruent verb-cued recall test of nouns after 2 weeks (Experiment 2). This finding suggests that successful memory retrieval and ensuing enactment contribute to future memory performance in parts via different mechanisms.