Stakeholder acceptance of digital team-based learning. (July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Stakeholder acceptance of digital team-based learning. (July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Stakeholder acceptance of digital team-based learning
- Authors:
- Currey, Judy
Sprogis, Stephanie K.
Burdeu, Gabby
Story, Ian
Considine, Julie
O'Donnell, Marcus
Gentle, Alex
Backhouse, Simon
Oldland, Elizabeth - Abstract:
- Abstract: Team-Based Learning (TBL) can be associated with administrative processes that are labour intensive. A commercially-available online system offered an opportunity to reduce this burden. The aims of this study were to test the feasibility of integrating digital TBL into health curricula, and to explore the experiences and perspectives of students and educators participating in digital TBL. A prospective mixed methods design was used to survey postgraduate nursing and optometry students (n = 162), and educators (n = 8) at an Australian university. Student and educator perceptions of digital TBL collected were: usability (System Usability Scale); level of student engagement (Student Self-Report of Engagement); and user satisfaction post-participation in digital TBL (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire). Mean Student Self-Report of Engagement Scores reflected high student engagement with significantly higher levels of engagement reported for digital ( x ‾ =4.16, SD = 0.199) over paper-based ( x ‾ =3.97, SD = 0.267) TBL (p = 0.001). System Usability Scores revealed students (during: x ‾ = 72.35, SD = 15.70; post: x ‾ = 74.02, SD = 14.00) and educators ( x ‾ =75.0, SD = 15.12) perceived usability of digital TBL to be above average for systems on this scale. Students ( x ‾ =2.40, SD = 0.19) and educators ( x ‾ =2.36, SD = 0.80) were highly satisfied with digital TBL (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire). High satisfaction and engagement outcomes suggestAbstract: Team-Based Learning (TBL) can be associated with administrative processes that are labour intensive. A commercially-available online system offered an opportunity to reduce this burden. The aims of this study were to test the feasibility of integrating digital TBL into health curricula, and to explore the experiences and perspectives of students and educators participating in digital TBL. A prospective mixed methods design was used to survey postgraduate nursing and optometry students (n = 162), and educators (n = 8) at an Australian university. Student and educator perceptions of digital TBL collected were: usability (System Usability Scale); level of student engagement (Student Self-Report of Engagement); and user satisfaction post-participation in digital TBL (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire). Mean Student Self-Report of Engagement Scores reflected high student engagement with significantly higher levels of engagement reported for digital ( x ‾ =4.16, SD = 0.199) over paper-based ( x ‾ =3.97, SD = 0.267) TBL (p = 0.001). System Usability Scores revealed students (during: x ‾ = 72.35, SD = 15.70; post: x ‾ = 74.02, SD = 14.00) and educators ( x ‾ =75.0, SD = 15.12) perceived usability of digital TBL to be above average for systems on this scale. Students ( x ‾ =2.40, SD = 0.19) and educators ( x ‾ =2.36, SD = 0.80) were highly satisfied with digital TBL (Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire). High satisfaction and engagement outcomes suggest digital TBL is feasible, efficient, engaging and well accepted by stakeholders. Highlights: Digital TBL systems promise improved efficiency during Team-Based Learning delivery. When implemented, these systems are well accepted by both students and staff. Crucially, student engagement increases with digital TBL over paper-based methods. Digital TBL is a highly feasible replacement for traditional TBL delivery methods. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Nurse education in practice. Volume 46(2020)
- Journal:
- Nurse education in practice
- Issue:
- Volume 46(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 46, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0046-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07
- Subjects:
- Active learning -- Team-based learning -- Digital learning -- Education -- Professional
Nursing -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals
Education, Nursing -- Periodicals
Nursing -- Study and teaching
Periodicals
Electronic journals
610.73071 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14715953 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1471-5953;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102833 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1471-5953
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6187.028370
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13749.xml