A comparative assessment of biological activities of Gundelia dersim Miller and Gundelia glabra Vitek, Yüce & Ergin extracts and their chemical characterization via HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS. (July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparative assessment of biological activities of Gundelia dersim Miller and Gundelia glabra Vitek, Yüce & Ergin extracts and their chemical characterization via HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS. (July 2020)
- Main Title:
- A comparative assessment of biological activities of Gundelia dersim Miller and Gundelia glabra Vitek, Yüce & Ergin extracts and their chemical characterization via HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS
- Authors:
- de la Luz Cádiz-Gurrea, María
Zengin, Gokhan
Leyva-Jiménez, Francisco Javier
Fernández-Ochoa, Álvaro
Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime
Cakilcioglu, Ugur
Babacan, Ebru Yuce
Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi
Picot-Allain, Carene
Xiao, Jianbo
Segura-Carretero, Antonio - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Highlights: Conventional and green extraction techniques were performed. 68 compounds were identified. Multivariate analysis was indicated the differences in the tested extracts. The presented results could be one methodological starting point. Abstract: Plants from the Gundelia genus have been well appraised as both food and remedies. The members of the Gundelia genus are widely used as foods in several countries including Turkey. This study presents a comparative assessment of two poorly studied Gundelia species ( G. glabra Miller and G. dersim Vitek, Yüce & Ergin). The effect of conventional (infusion, maceration, and Soxhlet extraction) and non-conventional (homogeniser and ultrasound assisted extraction) methods of extraction of bioactive secondary metabolites from the selected Gundelia species was also assessed. A total of 68 different compounds were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS) technique. Non-conventional extraction techniques do not guarantee higher antioxidant activity. As such, G. dersim (91.27, 138.87, 182.28, and 125.65 mg TE [Trolox equivalent]/g dried extract, for 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2, 2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays, respectively).The highest α-glucosidase inhibition was recorded forGraphical abstract: Highlights: Conventional and green extraction techniques were performed. 68 compounds were identified. Multivariate analysis was indicated the differences in the tested extracts. The presented results could be one methodological starting point. Abstract: Plants from the Gundelia genus have been well appraised as both food and remedies. The members of the Gundelia genus are widely used as foods in several countries including Turkey. This study presents a comparative assessment of two poorly studied Gundelia species ( G. glabra Miller and G. dersim Vitek, Yüce & Ergin). The effect of conventional (infusion, maceration, and Soxhlet extraction) and non-conventional (homogeniser and ultrasound assisted extraction) methods of extraction of bioactive secondary metabolites from the selected Gundelia species was also assessed. A total of 68 different compounds were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS) technique. Non-conventional extraction techniques do not guarantee higher antioxidant activity. As such, G. dersim (91.27, 138.87, 182.28, and 125.65 mg TE [Trolox equivalent]/g dried extract, for 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2, 2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays, respectively).The highest α-glucosidase inhibition was recorded for the extracts obtained by ultrasonication. In the multivariate analysis, the extracts from Gundelia species were separated based on their biological activities. The presented findings could be one methodological starting point for designing novel products from two Gundelia species. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Process biochemistry. Volume 94(2020)
- Journal:
- Process biochemistry
- Issue:
- Volume 94(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 94, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 94
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0094-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 143
- Page End:
- 151
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07
- Subjects:
- Gundelia -- Antioxidant -- Enzyme inhibition -- Flavonoids -- Natural agents
Biochemical engineering -- Periodicals
Biotechnology -- Periodicals
Biochemistry -- periodicals
Biotechnology -- periodicals
Chemical Engineering -- periodicals
Génie biochimique -- Périodiques
Biotechnologie -- Périodiques
Biochemical engineering
Biotechnology
Periodicals
660.63 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13595113 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.04.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-5113
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6849.983500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13419.xml