Panic Attack: How Illegitimate Invasions of Privacy Cause Consumer Anxiety and Dissatisfaction. Issue 3 (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Esmark Jones, Carol L.; Stevens, Jennifer L.; Noble, Stephanie M.; Breazeale, Michael J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of public policy & marketing. Volume 39:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 334
• Page End: 352
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: coping theory -- personal space -- privacy -- reactance theory -- satisfaction -- visual; Marketing -- Periodicals; Marketing -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 658.802
• DOI: 10.1177/0743915619870480
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-9156

Abstract

This research fills a gap in the literature regarding face-to-face privacy invasions. Most research in the privacy arena examines information privacy (e.g., credit card and data information) and ignores the privacy component of face-to-face interactions. Using three studies, the authors explore the impact of physical and visual invasions on privacy control. The findings show that only one dimension of privacy needs to be invaded for consumers to feel less control over their privacy. Perceptions of privacy control have a negative relationship with satisfaction, as mediated through feelings of anxiety. Importantly, two invasions do not have a greater impact than one, and a legitimate reason for physical or visual invasions can lessen the negative consequences in terms of anxiety and satisfaction. These results have important theoretical and practical implications for marketers aiming to design satisfying consumption experiences that also preserve consumer welfare.