Associative binding in early childhood: Evidence from a preferential looking paradigm. Issue 2 (12th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, Elliott G.; Leckey, Sarah; Davinson, Kelsey; Ghetti, Simona
• Is Part Of: Developmental psychobiology. Volume 62:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 266
• Page End: 278
• Publication Date: 2019-08-12
• Subjects: associative binding -- early childhood -- memory -- visual paired comparison task; Psychobiology -- Periodicals; 155
• DOI: 10.1002/dev.21904
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-1630

Abstract

Abstract: Relational memory processes are responsible for forming representations that bind together the co‐occurring elements of an experience. These processes provide a foundation of episodic memory, the capacity to remember specific events about one's past. In the present research, we used a visual comparison paradigm to determine whether toddlers can form memories for the relation between co‐occurring items. In Experiment 1, 66 2‐year‐olds viewed pairs of cartoon faces (AB; CD) and did not show a significant novelty preference for the violated associations (i.e., did not look longer at AD rearranged pair than old AB pair when exposed to AD‐AB). However, toddlers looked longest at the individual face (i.e., D) violating a studied pair, which appeared to be supported by visual preference for centrally located stimuli. In Experiment 2, 46 2‐year‐olds participated in a similar procedure, but faces violating the pair during test were located to the periphery (e.g., AB‐AC). Under these conditions, toddlers looked longer at recombined pair AC. Overall, our results show that toddlers show some ability to make item‐item associations but may need to overcome preferential looking biases to demonstrate this capacity. Furthermore, looking behaviors beyond overall novelty preference may be informative even when overall novelty preference is not found.