Difference between 24-h diet recall and urine excretion for assessing population sodium and potassium intake in adults aged 18–39 y. Issue 2 (17th December 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Difference between 24-h diet recall and urine excretion for assessing population sodium and potassium intake in adults aged 18–39 y. Issue 2 (17th December 2014)
- Main Title:
- Difference between 24-h diet recall and urine excretion for assessing population sodium and potassium intake in adults aged 18–39 y
- Authors:
- Mercado, Carla I
Cogswell, Mary E
Valderrama, Amy L
Wang, Chia-Yih
Loria, Catherine M
Moshfegh, Alanna J
Rhodes, Donna G
Carriquiry, Alicia L - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Background: Limited data are available on the accuracy of 24-h dietary recalls used to monitor US sodium and potassium intakes. Objective: We examined the difference in usual sodium and potassium intakes estimated from 24-h dietary recalls and urine collections. Design: We used data from a cross-sectional study in 402 participants aged 18–39 y (~50% African American) in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area in 2011. We estimated means and percentiles of usual intakes of daily dietary sodium (dNa) and potassium (dK) and 24-h urine excretion of sodium (uNa) and potassium (uK). We examined Spearman's correlations and differences between estimates from dietary and urine measures. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate the factors associated with the difference between dietary and urine measures. Results: Mean differences between diet and urine estimates were higher in men [dNa – uNa (95% CI) = 936.8 (787.1, 1086.5) mg/d and dK – uK = 571.3 (448.3, 694.3) mg/d] than in women [dNa – uNa (95% CI) = 108.3 (11.1, 205.4) mg/d and dK – uK = 163.4 (85.3, 241.5 mg/d)]. Percentile distributions of diet and urine estimates for sodium and potassium differed for men. Spearman's correlations between measures were 0.16 for men and 0.25 for women for sodium and 0.39 for men and 0.29 for women for potassium. Urinary creatinine, total caloric intake, and percentages of nutrient intake from mixed dishes were independently and consistently associated with the differencesABSTRACT: Background: Limited data are available on the accuracy of 24-h dietary recalls used to monitor US sodium and potassium intakes. Objective: We examined the difference in usual sodium and potassium intakes estimated from 24-h dietary recalls and urine collections. Design: We used data from a cross-sectional study in 402 participants aged 18–39 y (~50% African American) in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area in 2011. We estimated means and percentiles of usual intakes of daily dietary sodium (dNa) and potassium (dK) and 24-h urine excretion of sodium (uNa) and potassium (uK). We examined Spearman's correlations and differences between estimates from dietary and urine measures. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate the factors associated with the difference between dietary and urine measures. Results: Mean differences between diet and urine estimates were higher in men [dNa – uNa (95% CI) = 936.8 (787.1, 1086.5) mg/d and dK – uK = 571.3 (448.3, 694.3) mg/d] than in women [dNa – uNa (95% CI) = 108.3 (11.1, 205.4) mg/d and dK – uK = 163.4 (85.3, 241.5 mg/d)]. Percentile distributions of diet and urine estimates for sodium and potassium differed for men. Spearman's correlations between measures were 0.16 for men and 0.25 for women for sodium and 0.39 for men and 0.29 for women for potassium. Urinary creatinine, total caloric intake, and percentages of nutrient intake from mixed dishes were independently and consistently associated with the differences between diet and urine estimates of sodium and potassium intake. For men, body mass index was also associated. Race was associated with differences in estimates of potassium intake. Conclusions: Low correlations and differences between dietary and urinary sodium or potassium may be due to measurement error in one or both estimates. Future analyses using these methods to assess sodium and potassium intake in relation to health outcomes may consider stratifying by factors associated with the differences in estimates from these methods. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01631240. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of clinical nutrition. Volume 101:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- American journal of clinical nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 101:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 101, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 101
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0101-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 376
- Page End:
- 386
- Publication Date:
- 2014-12-17
- Subjects:
- biomarker -- diet -- sodium -- urine -- validation study
Diet therapy -- Periodicals
Nutrition -- Periodicals
Dietetics -- Periodicals
613.205 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/ ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-american-journal-of-clinical-nutrition ↗
https://ajcn.nutrition.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3945/ajcn.113.081604 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-9165
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0823.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12954.xml