Two Different Doses of Supplemental Vitamin A Did Not Affect Mortality of Normal-Birth-Weight Neonates in Guinea-Bissau in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Issue 9 (2nd July 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Two Different Doses of Supplemental Vitamin A Did Not Affect Mortality of Normal-Birth-Weight Neonates in Guinea-Bissau in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Issue 9 (2nd July 2014)
- Main Title:
- Two Different Doses of Supplemental Vitamin A Did Not Affect Mortality of Normal-Birth-Weight Neonates in Guinea-Bissau in a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors:
- Benn, Christine S.
Diness, Birgitte R.
Balde, Ibraima
Rodrigues, Amabelia
Lausch, Karen R.
Martins, Cesario L.
Fisker, Ane B.
Aaby, Peter - Abstract:
- Abstract: Whether neonatal vitamin A supplementation (NVAS) should be policy in areas with vitamin A deficiency is debated. We observed that a smaller dose of vitamin A may decrease mortality more than a larger dose and conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Guinea-Bissau with the primary aim of comparing the effect of 50, 000 with 25, 000 IU neonatal vitamin A on infant mortality. The secondary aim was to study the effect of NVAS vs. placebo, including a combined analysis of NVAS trials. Between 2004 and 2007, normal-birth-weight neonates were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to be administered 2 different doses of vitamin A (50, 000 or 25, 000 IU) or placebo. Infant mortality rates (MRs) were compared in Cox models providing MR ratios (MRRs). Among 6048 children enrolled, there were 160 deaths in 4125 person-years (MR = 39/1000). There was no difference in mortality between the 2 dosage groups: the MRR for 25, 000 vs. 50, 000 IU was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.38). Neither dose of NVAS was associated with lower mortality than placebo (MRR = 1.28; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.81). In a combined analysis of the present trial and 2 previous NVAS trials in Guinea-Bissau, the effect of receiving NVAS (any dose) vs. placebo was 1.13 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.36) and differed significantly ( P = 0.01) between boys (0.80; 95% CI: 0.58, 1.09) and girls (1.35; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.75). We could not confirm that a smaller dose of neonatal vitamin A reduces mortality more than a largerAbstract: Whether neonatal vitamin A supplementation (NVAS) should be policy in areas with vitamin A deficiency is debated. We observed that a smaller dose of vitamin A may decrease mortality more than a larger dose and conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Guinea-Bissau with the primary aim of comparing the effect of 50, 000 with 25, 000 IU neonatal vitamin A on infant mortality. The secondary aim was to study the effect of NVAS vs. placebo, including a combined analysis of NVAS trials. Between 2004 and 2007, normal-birth-weight neonates were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to be administered 2 different doses of vitamin A (50, 000 or 25, 000 IU) or placebo. Infant mortality rates (MRs) were compared in Cox models providing MR ratios (MRRs). Among 6048 children enrolled, there were 160 deaths in 4125 person-years (MR = 39/1000). There was no difference in mortality between the 2 dosage groups: the MRR for 25, 000 vs. 50, 000 IU was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.38). Neither dose of NVAS was associated with lower mortality than placebo (MRR = 1.28; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.81). In a combined analysis of the present trial and 2 previous NVAS trials in Guinea-Bissau, the effect of receiving NVAS (any dose) vs. placebo was 1.13 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.36) and differed significantly ( P = 0.01) between boys (0.80; 95% CI: 0.58, 1.09) and girls (1.35; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.75). We could not confirm that a smaller dose of neonatal vitamin A reduces mortality more than a larger dose. We confirmed 2 other trials in Guinea-Bissau that showed no beneficial effect of NVAS. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00168610. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of nutrition. Volume 144:Issue 9(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 144:Issue 9(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 144, Issue 9 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 144
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0144-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1474
- Page End:
- 1479
- Publication Date:
- 2014-07-02
- Subjects:
- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Diet -- Periodicals
613.205 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-journal-of-nutrition ↗
https://jn.nutrition.org/ ↗
https://academic.oup.com/jn ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3945/jn.114.192674 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-3166
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5024.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12783.xml