The interplay of nested biotic interactions and the abiotic environment regulates populations of a hypersymbiont. Issue 12 (11th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mestre, Alexandre; Poulin, Robert; Holt, Robert D.; Barfield, Michael; Clamp, John C.; Fernandez‐Leborans, Gregorio; Mesquita‐Joanes, Francesc
• Editors: Hoye, Bethany
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal ecology. Volume 88:Issue 12(2019)
• Page Start: 1998
• Page End: 2010
• Publication Date: 2019-09-11
• Subjects: abundance -- dispersal -- host traits -- nested hosts -- niche -- occupancy -- symbiotic host; Animal ecology -- Periodicals; 591.7
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13091
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8790

Abstract

Abstract: The role of biotic interactions in shaping the distribution and abundance of species should be particularly pronounced in symbionts. Indeed, symbionts have a dual niche composed of traits of their individual hosts and the abiotic environment external to the host, and often combine active dispersal at finer scales with host‐mediated dispersal at broader scales. The biotic complexity in the determinants of species distribution and abundance should be even more pronounced for hyper symbionts (symbionts of other symbionts). We use a chain of symbiosis to explore the relative influence of nested biotic interactions and the abiotic environment on occupancy and abundance of a hypersymbiont. Our empirical system is the epibiont ciliate Lagenophrys discoidea, which attaches to an ostracod that is itself ectosymbiotic on crayfish (the basal host). We applied multimodel selection and variance partitioning for GLMM to assess the relative importance of (a) traits of symbiotic hosts (ostracod sex and abundance), (b) traits of basal hosts (crayfish body weight, abundance and intermoult stage), (c) the abiotic environment (water chemistry and climate) and (d) geospatial autocorrelation patterns (capturing potential effects of crayfish dispersal among localities). Our models explained about half of the variation in prevalence and abundance of the hypersymbiont. Variation in prevalence was partly explained, in decreasing order of importance (18%–4%) by shared effects of symbiotic host traits and the abiotic environment, pure fixed effects of symbiotic hosts, abiotic environment and geospatial patterns (traits of basal hosts were not relevant). Hypersymbiont abundance was most strongly explained by random effects of host traits (mainly the symbiotic host), in addition to weaker fixed effects (mostly abiotic environment). Our results highlight the major role of the interplay between abundance of symbiotic hosts and water physico‐chemistry in regulating populations of a hypersymbiotic ciliate, which is likely critical for dispersal dynamics, availability of attachment resources and suitability of on‐host living conditions for the ciliate. We also found moderate signal of regulation by the basal host, for which we propose three mechanisms: (a) modulation of microhabitat suitability (crayfish‐created water currents); (b) concentration of symbiotic hosts within crayfish; and (c) dispersal mediated by crayfish. Abstract : This article examines factors that regulate populations of a hypersymbiont (symbiont of a symbiont) that lives exposed to the water from which it obtains food. The authors provide the first evidence that the hypersymbiotic ciliate's ostracod host and the ostracod's crayfish host together with water physico‐chemistry regulate populations of the ciliate.