Measuring food preference and reward: Application and cross-cultural adaptation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in human experimental research. (March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Measuring food preference and reward: Application and cross-cultural adaptation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in human experimental research. (March 2020)
- Main Title:
- Measuring food preference and reward: Application and cross-cultural adaptation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in human experimental research
- Authors:
- Oustric, Pauline
Thivel, David
Dalton, Michelle
Beaulieu, Kristine
Gibbons, Catherine
Hopkins, Mark
Blundell, John
Finlayson, Graham - Abstract:
- Highlights: The LFPQ is a widely-used tool that measures liking and implicit wanting for food. Standards of good practice enable consistency in its adaptation and application. Appropriate food stimuli require both nutritional and perceptual validation. Validation of the task involves demonstration of its sensitivity and reliability. This protocol will improve comparability and quality of data generated by the LFPQ. Abstract: Decisions about what we eat play a central role in human appetite and energy balance. Measuring food reward and its underlying components of implicit motivation (wanting) and explicit sensory pleasure (liking) is therefore important in understanding which foods are preferred in a given context and at a given moment in time. Among the different methods used to measure food reward, the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ) is a well-established tool that has been widely used in the scientific field for over 10 years. The original LFPQ measures explicit liking and implicit wanting for the same visual food stimuli varying along two nutritional dimensions: fat (high or low) and taste (sweet or savoury/non-sweet). With increasing use of the LFPQ (in original or adapted forms) across different cultural and scientific contexts, there is a need for a set of recommendations for effective execution as well as cultural and nutritional adaptations of the tool. This paper aims to describe the current status of the LFPQ for researchers new to the methodology, andHighlights: The LFPQ is a widely-used tool that measures liking and implicit wanting for food. Standards of good practice enable consistency in its adaptation and application. Appropriate food stimuli require both nutritional and perceptual validation. Validation of the task involves demonstration of its sensitivity and reliability. This protocol will improve comparability and quality of data generated by the LFPQ. Abstract: Decisions about what we eat play a central role in human appetite and energy balance. Measuring food reward and its underlying components of implicit motivation (wanting) and explicit sensory pleasure (liking) is therefore important in understanding which foods are preferred in a given context and at a given moment in time. Among the different methods used to measure food reward, the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ) is a well-established tool that has been widely used in the scientific field for over 10 years. The original LFPQ measures explicit liking and implicit wanting for the same visual food stimuli varying along two nutritional dimensions: fat (high or low) and taste (sweet or savoury/non-sweet). With increasing use of the LFPQ (in original or adapted forms) across different cultural and scientific contexts, there is a need for a set of recommendations for effective execution as well as cultural and nutritional adaptations of the tool. This paper aims to describe the current status of the LFPQ for researchers new to the methodology, and to provide standards of good practice that can be adopted for its cultural adaptation and use in the laboratory or clinic. This paper details procedures for the creation and validation of appropriate food stimuli; implementation of the tool for sensitive measures of food reward; and interpretation of the main end-points of the LFPQ. Following these steps will facilitate comparisons of findings between studies and lead to a better understanding of the role of food reward in human eating behaviour. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Food quality and preference. Volume 80(2020)
- Journal:
- Food quality and preference
- Issue:
- Volume 80(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 80, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 80
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0080-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03
- Subjects:
- LFPQ Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire -- HFSA high-fat savoury -- LFSA low-fat savoury -- HFSW high-fat sweet -- LFSW low-fat sweet -- VAS Visual Analogue Scale
Food reward -- Protocol -- Standard operating procedure -- LFPQ -- Liking -- Wanting
Food preferences -- Periodicals
Food -- Quality -- Periodicals
Food industry and trade -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Préférences alimentaires -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Qualité -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Industrie et commerce -- Qualité -- Contrôle -- Périodiques
Food industry and trade -- Quality control
Food preferences
Food -- Quality
Periodicals
664 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09503293 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103824 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0950-3293
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3981.865400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12092.xml