An extension of the dark triad and five‐factor model to three Asian societies. Issue 4 (24th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Arseneault, Rene; Catano, Victor
• Is Part Of: Asian journal of social psychology. Volume 22:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 358
• Page End: 368
• Publication Date: 2019-06-24
• Subjects: Asia -- Big Five Framework -- construct validity -- cross‐cultural -- dark triad; Social psychology -- Periodicals; Social psychology -- Asia -- Periodicals; 302.095
• DOI: 10.1111/ajsp.12378
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1367-2223

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of this study is to test the external validity of the short dark triad (SD3) and see whether the dark triad (DT) framework is replicable in Asian societies. In three independent studies involving 443 participants from South Korea, China, and the Philippines, we extend short measures of the DT and the big five framework as well as conduct confirmatory factor analysis to test various models of the SD3 in each country. We also test for measurement invariance, report intercorrelations, alpha coefficients, and gender differences within each sample. Except for Machiavellianism, all models failed configural invariance. Despite failing configural invariance across all three countries, males consistently reported higher means on all DT traits, with psychopathy the lowest, and DT constructs were significantly intercorrelated with each other across all three samples, demonstrating a pattern of consistency with previous DT literature and findings. As the DT continues to gain in popularity and is beginning to surface in cross‐cultural research, we contribute to discussions concerned with the construct's external validity. Our study's findings question what, if any, meaningful interpretations can be made from extending Western‐based personality instruments to Asian (foreign) societies. Limitations and contributions of this study are outlined, and recommendations for future research are summarized.