Discourse effects on older children's interpretations of complement control and temporal adjunct control. (2nd October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Janke, Vikki
• Is Part Of: Language acquisition. Volume 25:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: 366
• Page End: 391
• Publication Date: 2018-10-02
• Subjects: Language acquisition -- Periodicals; 401.9305
• DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2017.1359271
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1048-9223

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The reference of understood subjects ( ec s) in complement control (John persuaded Peteri ec i to read the book) and temporal adjunct control (Johni tapped Peter while eci reading the book) has long been described as restricted to the object and subject of the main clause respectively. These restrictions have shaped the grammatical targets proposed for children, most of whom are reported as having acquired both subtypes by age 7. Using three picture-selection tasks, 76 children's (34 girls; aged 6;09–11;08) interpretations of the ec s were tested. Task 1 established their baseline preferences. Task 2 weakly cued the ec s toward an alternative referent and Task 3 strongly toward an alternative referent. Complement control responses were consistent across all tasks, but in adjunct control they shifted significantly toward the object in Task 3—a pattern mirrored by 15 adults. Responses in adjunct control also exhibited a degree of fluctuation in the baseline condition that complement control did not. A follow-up study on adjunct control showed that neither children nor adults permitted an external-referent reading, even when strongly cued in that direction. Two alternative proposals are discussed: one in which the results are viewed solely as the product of a parser's sensitivity to activation and another that proposes two possible structures for adjunct control; this permits the evident interpretation shift yet gives precedence to the highly preferred subject-oriented reading.