Learning to Give Reverse Causality Explanations for Correlations: Still Hard After All These Tries. (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sibulkin, Amy E.; Butler, J. S.
• Is Part Of: Teaching of psychology. Volume 46:Number 3(2019:Jul.)
• Page Start: 223
• Page End: 229
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: critical thinking -- research methods -- bidirectional causation -- reverse causality -- authentic assessment -- psychology majors -- historically Black colleges -- correlation -- causation; Psychology -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Periodicals; 150.711
• DOI: 10.1177/0098628319853936
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0098-6283

Abstract

After explicit instruction on how to give possible bidirectional (two-way) causality explanations for a correlation, 240 students from eight sections of social psychology and research methods courses wrote "reverse causality" explanations on various test questions, creating a total of 882 answers. Averaging across multiple graded attempts over four semesters, only 45% of the explanations were correct. The highest average for a single question was 67% correct. A regression predicting correct answers showed that students with higher grade point averages (GPAs) were more likely to answer correctly. Controlling for GPA and topic of the correlation, later attempts were significantly more likely to be answered correctly than earlier attempts.