The ability to evaluate arguments in scientific texts: Measurement, cognitive processes, nomological network, and relevance for academic success at the university. (17th June 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The ability to evaluate arguments in scientific texts: Measurement, cognitive processes, nomological network, and relevance for academic success at the university. (17th June 2019)
- Main Title:
- The ability to evaluate arguments in scientific texts: Measurement, cognitive processes, nomological network, and relevance for academic success at the university
- Authors:
- Münchow, Hannes
Richter, Tobias
von der Mühlen, Sarah
Schmid, Sebastian - Other Names:
- Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia Olga guestEditor.
Shavelson Richard J. guestEditor. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The evaluation of informal arguments is a key component of comprehending scientific texts and scientific literacy. Aim: The present study examined the nomological network of university students' ability to evaluate informal arguments in scientific texts and the relevance of this ability for academic success. Sample: A sample of 225 university students from the social and educational sciences participated in the study. Methods: Judgements of plausibility and the ability to recognize argumentation fallacies were assessed with a novel computer‐based diagnostic instrument (Argument Judgement Test; AJT). Results: The items of the AJT partly conform to a 1‐PL model and test scores were systematically related to epistemological beliefs and verbal intelligence. Item‐by‐item analyses of responses and response times showed that implausible arguments were more difficult to process and correct responses to these items required increased cognitive effort. Finally, the AJT scores predicted academic success at university even if verbal intelligence and grade point average were controlled for. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the ability to evaluate arguments in scientific texts is an aspect of rationality, relies on reflective processes, and is relevant for academic success.
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of educational psychology. Volume 89:Number 3(2019)
- Journal:
- British journal of educational psychology
- Issue:
- Volume 89:Number 3(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 89, Issue 3 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 89
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0089-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 501
- Page End:
- 523
- Publication Date:
- 2019-06-17
- Subjects:
- plausibility judgements -- recognition of argumentation fallacies -- nomological network -- academic success
Educational psychology -- Periodicals
370.1505 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8279 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjep ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjep.12298 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-0998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2307.650000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11440.xml