A multiple‐method analysis of appraisal–emotion relationships: The case of the prosocial intergroup emotions. Issue 3 (7th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fernando, Julian W.; Kashima, Yoshihisa; Laham, Simon M.
• Is Part Of: Asian journal of social psychology. Volume 22:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 227
• Page End: 243
• Publication Date: 2019-02-07
• Subjects: anger -- appraisal -- emotion -- guilt -- intergroup -- sympathy; Social psychology -- Periodicals; Social psychology -- Asia -- Periodicals; 302.095
• DOI: 10.1111/ajsp.12360
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1367-2223

Abstract

Abstract : Despite its status as a prominent set of theories for explaining the elicitation and differentiation of emotions, much appraisal theory and research offer little indication of the nature of the relationship expected between appraisals and emotions. Here, we present a three‐study, multiple‐method analysis in which we examine numerous ways of testing appraisal–emotion relationships using the "prosocial" intergroup emotions—sympathy, anger, and guilt—as an example. Results show that the set of appraisal dimensions that appears strongly characteristic of an emotion varies depending on the kind of appraisal—emotion relationship hypothesised and the experimental methodology/statistical analysis used. These findings demonstrate the utility of explicit theorising about the nature of the relationship between emotions and appraisals, and show how the hypothesised appraisal–emotion relationship and choice of methodology can affect the structure of appraisal theories. We recommend an analysis across multiple methods to provide a more complete picture of a given set of appraisal–emotion relationships.