Dry fractionation methods for plant protein, starch and fiber enrichment: A review. (April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Assatory, Andrew; Vitelli, Michael; Rajabzadeh, Amin Reza; Legge, Raymond L.
• Is Part Of: Trends in food science & technology. Volume 86(2019)
• Page Start: 340
• Page End: 351
• Publication Date: 2019-04
• Subjects: Air classification -- Dry fractionation -- Electrostatic separation -- Fiber -- Protein -- Starch; Food industry and trade -- Periodicals; Food -- Biotechnology -- Periodicals; 664.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0924-2244

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Conventional methods for extraction of plantprotein, starch andfiber use solvents and intensive drying. These processes are energy intensive and can alter the native structure and function of isolates.Dry fractionation methods have been investigated as solvent-free means for the production ofprotein-, starch- andfiber- enriched products. Two widely studied methods for dry fractionation of plant flours areair classification andelectrostatic separation . Scope and approach: Several aspects of bothair classification andelectrostatic separation are reviewed: basic operating principles; the effect of milling conditions; physical factors that influence separation efficiency; isolate structure and function; and advantages and disadvantages with respect to traditional wet processes. Quantitative approaches in the design and analysis ofdry fractionation are also reviewed, in addition to recent patent developments and future prospects of the technology. Key findings and conclusions: Dry fractionation methods exhibit lower energy and water consumption relative to wet extraction and retain native structure and function of components. However, these technologies are not yet suitable for the production of high-purity isolates (>90%). Physical limitations of these technologies, such as powder fouling and low process yield, may pose problems for commercialization. Increases in product concentration have been achieved by recycling fractions and by combining different separation techniques in series, such as air classification followed by electrostatic separation. Recent patents show a trend in the development of technologies that integrate elements of milling, sieving, air classification andelectrostatic separation . Highlights: Dry fractionation technologies consume less water and energy than wet processes. Dry fractionation technologies preserve the component(s) native state. Isolate purity from dry fractionation is much lower than wet extraction. Several physical factors and pre-treatment conditions affect yield and efficiency. Future technologies will likely integrate various separation approaches.