Assessment of Teams in a Digital Game Environment. (December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mayer, Igor
• Is Part Of: Simulation & gaming. Volume 49:Number 6(2018)
• Page Start: 602
• Page End: 619
• Publication Date: 2018-12
• Subjects: serious games -- team assessment -- team training -- validation; Social sciences -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Simulation methods -- Periodicals; Game theory -- Periodicals; Sciences sociales -- Étude et enseignement -- Périodiques; Simulation, Méthodes de -- Périodiques; Jeu de rôle -- Périodiques; Éducation; Jeu d'entreprise; Jeu de simulation; Méthode de simulation; Sciences sociales; Théorie des jeux; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 003.3
• DOI: 10.1177/1046878118770831
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1046-8781

Abstract

Background. Despite the increasing pervasiveness of digital entertainment and serious games in organisational life, there is little evidence for thevalidity ofgame-based team training andassessment . Aim. The authors used the game, TEAMUP for a series of team training andassessment sessions, while at the same time researching the internal validity of the game for this purpose. Method. A total of 106 sets of data on games played by teams of professionals (police officers, auditors, consultants, etc.) and undergraduates and postgraduates (in aerospace engineering, entrepreneurship, etc.) were gathered for analysis through pre- and post-game questionnaires focusing on constructs for team quality, such aspsychological safety andteam cohesiveness . In addition, a large quantity of such data as time to complete task, distance and avoidable mistakes were logged to measurein-game team performance . Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to find relationships between team structure factors, team quality constructs and in-game performance measures. Results. The main finding is that the in-game performance measure 'avoidable mistakes ' (a proxy for task quality) correlates markedly and pervasively with 'team cohesiveness '. More important, the findings support the premise that in-game assessment can be internally valid for team research and assessment purposes.