The most valuable player may not be on the winning team: Uncovering consumer tolerance for color shades in roses. (January 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The most valuable player may not be on the winning team: Uncovering consumer tolerance for color shades in roses. (January 2016)
- Main Title:
- The most valuable player may not be on the winning team: Uncovering consumer tolerance for color shades in roses
- Authors:
- Grygorczyk, A.
Mhlanga, S.
Lesschaeve, I. - Abstract:
- Highlights: Examined consumer preferences for rose colors. Consumer tolerance to shade variations differs across color categories. Some color categories are riskier pursuits than others. Abstract: Color is often found to be the most important factor driving consumer purchase decisions for flowers. However due to the sheer number of flower color options available, pinpointing which flower shades to aim for in a breeding program is a complex task. Discussions with local growers revealed discrepancies between color preferences previously identified and actual consumer demand. The present work examines this in further detail by applying two methods of testing consumer flower color preference with the same panel of consumers: conjoint analysis using color categories and a follow-up question asking consumers to pick their 3 most preferred colors from a chart of 60 colors. Consumers were found to have different tolerance ranges for shades across color categories. Consumers have a wide range of tolerance for red colors, making this a safe target as nearly all shades of red tested were well liked by consumers. By contrast, in the yellow category there was one very high performing shade, with consumer preference dropping off sharply with any deviation from this shade. While this particular shade of yellow could potentially be highly successful with consumers, it is a riskier target as breeders would have a narrow range of tolerance in shade variation to achieve consumer success. ThisHighlights: Examined consumer preferences for rose colors. Consumer tolerance to shade variations differs across color categories. Some color categories are riskier pursuits than others. Abstract: Color is often found to be the most important factor driving consumer purchase decisions for flowers. However due to the sheer number of flower color options available, pinpointing which flower shades to aim for in a breeding program is a complex task. Discussions with local growers revealed discrepancies between color preferences previously identified and actual consumer demand. The present work examines this in further detail by applying two methods of testing consumer flower color preference with the same panel of consumers: conjoint analysis using color categories and a follow-up question asking consumers to pick their 3 most preferred colors from a chart of 60 colors. Consumers were found to have different tolerance ranges for shades across color categories. Consumers have a wide range of tolerance for red colors, making this a safe target as nearly all shades of red tested were well liked by consumers. By contrast, in the yellow category there was one very high performing shade, with consumer preference dropping off sharply with any deviation from this shade. While this particular shade of yellow could potentially be highly successful with consumers, it is a riskier target as breeders would have a narrow range of tolerance in shade variation to achieve consumer success. This study presents a new understanding of consumer preference as it suggests that consumers exhibit not only preference intensity for sensory stimuli, but also a tolerance range for variations on the stimulus. Interestingly, tolerance ranges are not consistent across categories of sensory stimuli (e.g. color categories). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Food quality and preference. Volume 47:Part A(2016)
- Journal:
- Food quality and preference
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Part A(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0047-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 23
- Page End:
- 28
- Publication Date:
- 2016-01
- Subjects:
- Conjoint analysis -- Consumer preference -- Tolerance range -- Roses -- Color
Food preferences -- Periodicals
Food -- Quality -- Periodicals
Food industry and trade -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Préférences alimentaires -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Qualité -- Périodiques
Aliments -- Industrie et commerce -- Qualité -- Contrôle -- Périodiques
Food industry and trade -- Quality control
Food preferences
Food -- Quality
Periodicals
664 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09503293 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.012 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0950-3293
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3981.865400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8995.xml